>> However, there are still formatting problems, as given in the
>> example below. See attached image.
>
> Is your git up to date? With 38a4db2d15f4 (my last commit) and
> 16d16717f3 (current HEAD), I get the attached output.
Oops, my mistake! Sorry for the noise. Everything's fine now.
Thank
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 16:44 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> Regarding your "Top" context: why do you override VerticalAxisGroup
> >> #'Y-extent = ##f? This is likely to confuse the layout algorithm
> >> even after the bug I mentioned is fixed.
> >
> > This was necessary for the old vertical lay
>> Regarding your "Top" context: why do you override VerticalAxisGroup
>> #'Y-extent = ##f? This is likely to confuse the layout algorithm
>> even after the bug I mentioned is fixed.
>
> This was necessary for the old vertical layout engine -- at least it
> served me well since a few years. I'l
>> What's the new method for providing proper distances between the
>> header, the body, and the footer of a page? If I do it the old way
>> (this is, I just run a new lilypond binary on my score) the footer
>> line gets always attached to the body without any vertical space
>> inbetween,
>
> You
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 09:05 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> [git b6e82e5a from today]
>
>
> Joe,
>
>
> since documentation of your changes is not yet available, I have to
> ask directly: What's the new method for providing proper distances
> between the header, the body, and the footer of a page
[git b6e82e5a from today]
Joe,
since documentation of your changes is not yet available, I have to
ask directly: What's the new method for providing proper distances
between the header, the body, and the footer of a page? If I do it
the old way (this is, I just run a new lilypond binary on my
