Op donderdag 01-01-2009 om 13:46 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Yes, but I see that there's still some LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
> gub/tools.py from the online git version -- lines 31 and 69.
Removing this works for a clean build of mingw:: and linux-64::lilypond
on linux-64, so I've p
Op donderdag 01-01-2009 om 13:46 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Yes, but I see that there's still some LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
> gub/tools.py from the online git version -- lines 31 and 69.
I see, you also removed the one at line 31 before. I was
thinking Rainold was OK with leaving
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:24:19AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op woensdag 31-12-2008 om 12:22 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> Hi Graham,
>
> > The latest commit to gub3 seems to have broken guile:
>
> Are you sure it is the latest; that one only remove ld_library_path
Op woensdag 31-12-2008 om 12:22 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
Hi Graham,
> The latest commit to gub3 seems to have broken guile:
Are you sure it is the latest; that one only remove ld_library_path,
see:
http://github.com/janneke/gub/commit/6fc87b06b23606fb29dac54761321adb0955b0
Hi Jan,
The latest commit to gub3 seems to have broken guile:
building package: tools::guile
*** Stage: untar (guile, tools)
*** Stage: patch (guile, tools)
*** Stage: autoupdate (guile, tools)
*** Stage: configure (guile, tools)
*** Stage: compile (guile, tools)
Command barfed: cd
/home/lil
