[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> the beat; it feels strange that the beginning of a beat in some sense is
> negative sometimes (though it's just infinitesimally). I have an idea of
> another timing system that would feel more logical: We could use a metric
> similar to the following (in terms of non-
An nice example for grace tuplets can be seen in two places of the first
movement of Ravel's piano trio
Regards, Arno
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:42:47 +0200, Erik Sandberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 11 October 2004 00.37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> be an app
On Monday 11 October 2004 00.37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > be an appoggiatura, where 3 notes take 1/8 time from the main note, could
> > also be the very theoretical case
> > { \grace {\times 2/3 {b16[ b b]} b16[ b]} b8 }
> > which would mean that the first 3 notes are
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 12.37, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> As Will Oram pointed out, there are problems when \break occur near grace
> notes.
>
> In this example, the second but not the first score does a line break:
>
> \version "2.3.11"
> A = \new Staff \notes {c1 | \grace c8 c1 }
> B = \new Staff \
As Will Oram pointed out, there are problems when \break occur near grace
notes.
In this example, the second but not the first score does a line break:
\version "2.3.11"
A = \new Staff \notes {c1 | \grace c8 c1 }
B = \new Staff \notes {c1 | \break c1 }
\book {
\score {<<\A \B>>}
\score {\B}
