On 2009-08-30, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Here are my configuration settings for FontForge on a i586 GNU/Linux
> > box: [...]
> >
> > --enable-double
>
> IIRC, this option is the very one which makes the problems disappear.
> Hmm. Perhaps it's better to write to the various distri
> Here are my configuration settings for FontForge on a i586 GNU/Linux
> box: [...]
>
> --enable-double
IIRC, this option is the very one which makes the problems disappear.
Hmm. Perhaps it's better to write to the various distribution
packagers, urging them to compile FontForge wi
> Hmm. I've seen these errors for a long time now (maybe a year and a
> half), and I'm always using the latest fontforge tarball.
>
> Testing CVS, I get similar errors, first appearing with feta11:
Interesting. I haven't seen them since a long time. Please report
this to the FontForge list. H
On 2009-08-28, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
> > contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
> > error is printed.
>
> They are contradictions, thus the internal error. It's a rounding
> issue in FontForge.
>
> > Executable
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:55:41AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Executable based on sources from 00:29 GMT 29-Apr-2008.
> > Library based on sources from 20:49 GMT 30-Apr-2008.
>
> This is ooold. I've compiled the current CVS of FontForge by myself,
> and I don't see this (and I haven't see
> I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
> contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
> error is printed.
They are contradictions, thus the internal error. It's a rounding
issue in FontForge.
> Executable based on sources from 00:29 GMT 29-Apr-2008.
> Libra
I have no idea what "monotonic", "needed", "unneeded", and
"Expected" mean in this context, but the following messages are
certainly amusing. :)
I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
error is printed.
Invoking "font
