[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> On 30-Oct-04, at 3:16 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> 4.7: talks about lilypond-latex and using the "old" wrapper that uses
> >> latex, unlike current LilyPond. Is that info correct, or should it be
> >> commented out until 3.0 arriv
On 30-Oct-04, at 3:16 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4.7: talks about lilypond-latex and using the "old" wrapper that uses
latex, unlike current LilyPond. Is that info correct, or should it be
commented out until 3.0 arrives? (I've changed "3.0" to "2.4" in the
text, but ot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Could somebody take a look at the following three sections?
>
> 4.7: talks about lilypond-latex and using the "old" wrapper that uses
> latex, unlike current LilyPond. Is that info correct, or should it be
> commented out until 3.0 arrives? (I've changed "3.0" to "2
Could somebody take a look at the following three sections?
4.7: talks about lilypond-latex and using the "old" wrapper that uses
latex, unlike current LilyPond. Is that info correct, or should it be
commented out until 3.0 arrives? (I've changed "3.0" to "2.4" in the
text, but otherwise left
