Re: fact check for manual: devel bugs

2004-09-13 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Sunday 12 September 2004 15.20, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > So: In my eyes, the following is a good bug report: > > > > It seems that the slur engine doesn't look at accidentals. In the > > following example, the slur touches the accidental. > > > > Using Mac OSX 10.3

Re: fact check for manual: devel bugs

2004-09-12 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So: In my eyes, the following is a good bug report: > > It seems that the slur engine doesn't look at accidentals. In the following > example, the slur touches the accidental. > > Using Mac OSX 10.3.4, fink package lilypond-unstable > > \version "2.3.11" > \relative

Re: fact check for manual: devel bugs

2004-09-12 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 01.16, Graham Percival wrote: > Should bugs in the devel version be sent to lilypond-devel, > bug-lilypond, or both? bug-lilypond, I would say. But it doesn't matter, I read both lists. As long as you add [bug] in the subject line for devel bugs, there is no risk that

fact check for manual: devel bugs

2004-09-07 Thread Graham Percival
Should bugs in the devel version be sent to lilypond-devel, bug-lilypond, or both? While we're on the subject, could Erik check the section "reporting bugs" chapter 4 of the manual (after the next release is ok; it's not urgent) ? I've added some more info, but since you're in charge of this