Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> some comments.
They're welcome.
> * Couldn't the print-method be added as a property to
> scm/define-music-types.scm for each type? (or perhaps as a list of
> methods?)
Good idea.
> * I think it is better to call the routines xxx-display-yyy
>
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Hi,
Here is a tested version of a `display-lily-music' function:
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/print-lily.scm
If you think this is not maintanable/good enough for the LilyPond
distribution, then I'll keep it somewhere else.
Hi,
some comments.
* Couldn't the print
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Hi,
Here is a tested version of a `display-lily-music' function:
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/print-lily.scm
The test file (around 115 expressions):
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/test-print-lily.scm
Hi Nicolas,
sorry for taking so long to reply. I'll look over you
Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The test file (around 115 expressions):
> http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/test-print-lily.scm
typo: http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/test-print-lily.ly
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
ht
Hi,
Here is a tested version of a `display-lily-music' function:
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/print-lily.scm
The test file (around 115 expressions):
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/test-print-lily.scm
The result (showing the differences between input and output, using
LilyPond from CVS, 2.5.3
