Re: discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: >> >> 0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in >>   define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to >>   the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it alto

Re: discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > > 0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in >   define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to >   the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it altogether? All of the IR 4 functions are auto-generated from C++

discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it altogether? 1) scheme-functions "dispatcher" and "listener" are in the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions, but should they be