On Oct 29, 2011, at 9:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> sorry about losing track of this.
>
> No need to apologize: _my_ computer is far too slow to be useful for
> bisection, anyway. It looks like we will have a bit of bijection
> flakiness for a while until we get th
Graham Percival writes:
> sorry about losing track of this.
No need to apologize: _my_ computer is far too slow to be useful for
bisection, anyway. It looks like we will have a bit of bijection
flakiness for a while until we get the staging business sorted out.
--
David Kastrup
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:31:16AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Sigh. Again it has not been fast-forwarded, but the history has been
> straightened out, dissolving my merge commit.
oops, I think this is my fault. I haven't read your last 20 or so
emails about git; I was too fixated on working o
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:43:20AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
After having my local staging up-to-date,
I just pushed staging~1 to origin/dev/staging.
>>>
>>> thanks, checked and pushed to master.
David Kastrup writes:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:43:20AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> After having my local staging up-to-date,
>>> I just pushed staging~1 to origin/dev/staging.
>>
>> thanks, checked and pushed to master.
>
> Sigh. Again it has not been f
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:43:20AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> After having my local staging up-to-date,
>> I just pushed staging~1 to origin/dev/staging.
>
> thanks, checked and pushed to master.
Sigh. Again it has not been fast-forwarded, but the history has b
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:43:20AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> After having my local staging up-to-date,
> I just pushed staging~1 to origin/dev/staging.
thanks, checked and pushed to master.
since the whole point of dev/staging is that it gets automatically
checked and pushed, there's no wa
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 07:52:52AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Can anybody shed some light on this? 5 minutes of poking around
>> > in the log file didn't reveal any other problems.
>>
>> I looked at the diff. Mike's favorite mista
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 07:52:52AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Can anybody shed some light on this? 5 minutes of poking around
>> > in the log file didn't reveal any other problems.
>>
>> I looked at the diff. Mike's favorite mista
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 07:52:52AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Can anybody shed some light on this? 5 minutes of poking around
> > in the log file didn't reveal any other problems.
>
> I looked at the diff. Mike's favorite mistake:
F
Graham Percival writes:
> Trying to build the docs on dev/staging fails with this:
>
>
> Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
> Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
> ...
> Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
> Error: Illegal entry in bfra
Trying to build the docs on dev/staging fails with this:
Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
...
Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
/usr/bin/tex
12 matches
Mail list logo
