Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread Janek Warchoł
2011/6/15 Graham Percival : > thanks, applied after squashing them into one patch. issue closed. > You might want to look into >  git rebase -i origin/master I know this. This change was originally 4 commits long, i reduced it to 2 :P Next time i'll reduce more. > also, your git repo might be u

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:33:54PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: > I should've noticed that also. > > Patches attached. thanks, applied after squashing them into one patch. You might want to look into git rebase -i origin/master also, your git repo might be unhappy the next time you do git pull

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread Janek Warchoł
2011/6/15 : > LGTM, please make one change, then send me the final version for > pushing. > http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/9001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode215 > Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi:215: available (relative to > the current build/ director

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread percival . music . ca
LGTM, please make one change, then send me the final version for pushing. http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/9001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/9001/Documentation/contribut

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread lemniskata . bernoullego
As you wish :) http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/5001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/5001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode201 Documentation/contributor/r

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread percival . music . ca
http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/5001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/5001/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode201 Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-15 Thread lemniskata . bernoullego
@Graham: perfect! you caught exactly the subtleties which i was worrying that might be there! http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/1/Documenta

Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-14 Thread percival . music . ca
http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode191 Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi:191:

describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)

2011-06-14 Thread lemniskata . bernoullego
Reviewers: Graham Percival, james.lowe_datacore.com, Message: A small change to the CG to make things more obvious for the beginners. I hope that what i wrote is true ;) Rewording suggestions are most welcome. http://codereview.appspot.com/4621041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.i