Re: convert-ly broken (CVS 2006-Nov-04)

2006-11-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> can you reconstruct when "previously" was? Hmm, I've only 2.9.21, and with this version it's already broken. Unfortunately, I don't have enough time to go further back in history. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org h

Re: convert-ly broken (CVS 2006-Nov-04)

2006-11-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Werner LEMBERG escreveu: In case the file's \version is recent enough, convert-ly doesn't emit anything. This is bad. Instead, it should copy the file verbatim to stdout, as it was done previously. can you reconstruct when "previously" was? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://w

convert-ly broken (CVS 2006-Nov-04)

2006-11-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
In case the file's \version is recent enough, convert-ly doesn't emit anything. This is bad. Instead, it should copy the file verbatim to stdout, as it was done previously. A trivial example to demonstrate it is a file xxx.ly which only contains \version "2.9.28" After saying convert-ly