Re: compiler flag issues

2019-12-01 Thread James Lowe
Hello, On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:00:19 -0500, Dan Eble wrote: > On Nov 28, 2019, at 03:13, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > This is very, very non-standard and completely undocumented. > > Not completely undocumented. The CG has said to run configure with > --disable-optimising for as long as I c

Re: compiler flag issues

2019-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> This is very, very non-standard and completely undocumented. > > Not completely undocumented. The CG has said to run configure with > --disable-optimising for as long as I can remember. I don't mean this option but the fact that CXXFLAGS as set by the user gets almost completely overwritten

Re: compiler flag issues

2019-11-30 Thread Dan Eble
On Nov 28, 2019, at 03:13, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > This is very, very non-standard and completely undocumented. Not completely undocumented. The CG has said to run configure with --disable-optimising for as long as I can remember. > Any idea how this could be improved? A good start would b

compiler flag issues

2019-11-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Most developers expect that you can easily adjust C++ compiler flags in a GNU package using CXXFLAGS. With LilyPond, however, this is quite problematic. Reason is that it internally uses the following variables to compute the final list of compiler flags (see files `c++-vars.make` and `aclocal.