Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-17 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 15, 2021, at 12:17, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> The "Unmetered music" section in the manual already discusses issues >> with bar numbers, accidentals, and autobeaming. It might be helpful >> to mention the workaround of using \partial 1024 s1024 to force a >> new measure at the end of a ca

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 15, 2021, at 18:58, Thomas Morley wrote: > > (3) if the cadenza has inner bar-lines, we should provide a simple > method to increase BarNumbers. Not sure, if we could implement this as > an automtism… I had a similar thought, but for a method to force a measure break, with other things (

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Fr., 15. Jan. 2021 um 02:36 Uhr schrieb Dan Eble : > > On Jan 14, 2021, at 19:13, Dan Eble wrote: > > > > On Jan 14, 2021, at 18:33, Dan Eble wrote: > >> > >> Alas, all is not well with earlier versions. Consider the confusing bar > >> numbers in the following elaboration of your example. H

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and >>> (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar >>> "|" does not create a new measure. >> >> Maybe the whole thing is primarily a documentation issue that could >> be fixed with prominent warnings at appro

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: > On Jan 15, 2021, at 06:53, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Werner LEMBERG writes: >> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar "|" does not create a new measure. >>> >>> May

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 15, 2021, at 06:53, David Kastrup wrote: > > Werner LEMBERG writes: > >>> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and >>> (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar "|" >>> does not create a new measure. >> >> Maybe the whole thing is primari

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread Dan Eble
> On Jan 15, 2021, at 04:53, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and >> (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar "|" >> does not create a new measure. > > Maybe the whole thing is primarily a documentation issue

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and >> (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar "|" >> does not create a new measure. > > Maybe the whole thing is primarily a documentation issue that could be > fixed with prominent

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and > (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar "|" > does not create a new measure. Maybe the whole thing is primarily a documentation issue that could be fixed with prominent warnings at appropriate places?

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-14 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 14, 2021, at 19:13, Dan Eble wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2021, at 18:33, Dan Eble wrote: >> >> Alas, all is not well with earlier versions. Consider the confusing bar >> numbers in the following elaboration of your example. How would you resolve >> it? > > My thoughts: > > Measure 1 is c

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-14 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 14, 2021, at 18:33, Dan Eble wrote: > > Alas, all is not well with earlier versions. Consider the confusing bar > numbers in the following elaboration of your example. How would you resolve > it? My thoughts: Measure 1 is complete, so the first "2" is not incorrect, though it might n

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-14 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 14, 2021, at 11:38, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Hi, > > this code > { > \cadenzaOn > b2 > \bar "|" > \cadenzaOff > R1 > } > returns bad output with current master. > 2.22.0 is ok. Alas, all is not well with earlier versions. Consider the confusing bar numbers in the following elabora

Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-14 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 14, 2021, at 11:38, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Hi, > > this code > { > \cadenzaOn > b2 > \bar "|" > \cadenzaOff > R1 > } > returns bad output with current master. > 2.22.0 is ok. Harm, Thanks for the report. I'll try to investigate within the next day. Regards, — Dan

cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy

2021-01-14 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi, this code { \cadenzaOn b2 \bar "|" \cadenzaOff R1 } returns bad output with current master. 2.22.0 is ok. Images attached. First bad commit: commit b65af84b861a9036c19b02f5de5be250d5fe0fa1 Author: Dan Eble Date: Sat Dec 12 11:15:07 2020 -0500 Timing_translator: set measureSt