Re: bump imagemagick in GUB

2010-12-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:44:41AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Graham Percival > wrote: > > You're going to laugh, since I specifically said I didn't want to > > change anything after the second beta... but can I push this?  If not, > > people running lilybuntu2

Re: bump imagemagick in GUB

2010-12-17 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > Hi Jan, > > You're going to laugh, since I specifically said I didn't want to > change anything after the second beta... but can I push this?  If not, > people running lilybuntu2 won't be able to run the regtest checker. > Should I change

Re: bump imagemagick in GUB

2010-12-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Graham Percival schreef op vr 17-12-2010 om 15:30 [+]: > > Hi Graham, > >> You're going to laugh, since I specifically said I didn't want to >> change anything after the second beta... but can I push this?  If not, >> people running l

Re: bump imagemagick in GUB

2010-12-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Graham Percival schreef op vr 17-12-2010 om 15:30 [+]: Hi Graham, > You're going to laugh, since I specifically said I didn't want to > change anything after the second beta... but can I push this? If not, > people running lilybuntu2 won't be able to run the regtest checker. Sure, I presume

bump imagemagick in GUB

2010-12-17 Thread Graham Percival
Hi Jan, You're going to laugh, since I specifically said I didn't want to change anything after the second beta... but can I push this? If not, people running lilybuntu2 won't be able to run the regtest checker. Cheers, - Graham From 04698f885393c8a0c9914206f603d7313404226e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2