Thanks a lot Werner, works like a charm!
JM
> Le 19 juil. 2020 à 09:11, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
>
>
>> In fact I did the ‘git clone’ afresh, moving aside previous
>> attempts. Thus the contents of ‘build’ on both OSes is the result of
>> the commands I showed, up to '../configure'.
>>
>>
> In fact I did the ‘git clone’ afresh, moving aside previous
> attempts. Thus the contents of ‘build’ on both OSes is the result of
> the commands I showed, up to '../configure'.
>
> That’s why I don’t get what happens…
For me, using an up-to-date MacPorts system, compilation of LilyPond
from
PS> My goal is to build Lily to do experiments on the Mac, which is much faster
and confortable for me to work with, rather that on my Debian virtual machine.
> Le 18 juil. 2020 à 17:23, Jacques Menu a écrit :
>
> Hello Jonas and Werner,
>
> In fact I did the ‘git clone’ afresh, moving aside p
Hello Jonas and Werner,
In fact I did the ‘git clone’ afresh, moving aside previous attempts. Thus the
contents of ‘build’ on both OSes is the result of the commands I showed, up to
'../configure'.
That’s why I don’t get what happens…
JM
> Le 18 juil. 2020 à 16:46, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and
> Mac OS X 10.14.6 (Mojave). On the latter, I installed Apple’s
> XCode, the needed tools in /opt with MacPorts, and the needed fonts
> in /opt/local/share/fonts/urw-core35-fonts.
You might apply
https://github.com/macports/m
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 18.07.2020, 15:14 +0200 schrieb Jacques Menu:
> Hello folks,
>
> I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and Mac OS X
> 10.14.6 (Mojave).
> On the latter, I installed Apple’s XCode, the needed tools in /opt with
> MacPorts, and the needed fonts in /opt
Hello folks,
I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and Mac OS X
10.14.6 (Mojave).
On the latter, I installed Apple’s XCode, the needed tools in /opt with
MacPorts, and the needed fonts in /opt/local/share/fonts/urw-core35-fonts.
Performing the same ‘git clone’ and the
Il giorno lun 9 dic 2019 alle 11:18, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Il giorno lun 9 dic 2019 alle 08:38, Werner LEMBERG ha
scritto:
Your `t1asm` binary crashes with a segmentation fault, as can be seen
in last two lines of `mf2pt1.strace.657213`:
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_M
Il giorno lun 9 dic 2019 alle 08:38, Werner LEMBERG ha
scritto:
Your `t1asm` binary crashes with a segmentation fault, as can be seen
in last two lines of `mf2pt1.strace.657213`:
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR,
si_addr=0x3055683} ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped)
>> Please try again with
>>strace -ff -o ~/mf2pt1.strace mf2pt1 feta11.mf
>> so that we can see the strace messages from `t1asm` also. Note that
>> you will get at least two files called `mf2pt1.strace.X`, where
>> `X` is a process ID.
>>
>
> Four log-files were created, and the 3
Le 08/12/2019 à 18:12, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Please try again with
strace -ff -o ~/mf2pt1.strace mf2pt1 feta11.mf
so that we can see the strace messages from `t1asm` also. Note that
you will get at least two files called `mf2pt1.strace.X`, where
`X` is a process ID.
Four log-
>> Strange indeed. Can you temporarily replace `mf2pt1` with a script
>> that calls `strace`? Something like
>>strace mf2pt1 ... &> ~/mf2pt1.strace.log
>> You could then investigate in more detail which files `mf2pt1` tries
>> to open and/or execute.
>>
>
> [jcharles@pc1 mf]$ strace mf2pt
Le 08/12/2019 à 17:10, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Strange indeed. Can you temporarily replace `mf2pt1` with a script
that calls `strace`? Something like
strace mf2pt1 ... &> ~/mf2pt1.strace.log
You could then investigate in more detail which files `mf2pt1` tries
to open and/or execute.
[
> which t1asm
> /usr/bin/t1asm
>
> so I don't see any reason why, just at once, it failed at running…
> after a good sleeping night!
Strange indeed. Can you temporarily replace `mf2pt1` with a script
that calls `strace`? Something like
strace mf2pt1 ... &> ~/mf2pt1.strace.log
You could the
Le 08/12/2019 à 16:51, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Can you execute t1asm?
t1asm --help
It works either in $HOME or in my compiling folders.
Is it in your path that you use for compiling lilypond?
which t1asm
/usr/bin/t1asm
so I don't see any reason why, just at once, it failed at runni
> I notice, upwards in the log, that
>
> Invoking "t1asm feta11.pt1 feta11.pfb"...
> mf2pt1: You'll need either to install t1utils and rerun mf2pt1 or find
> another way to convert feta11.pt1 to feta11.pfb
>
>
> despite I've t1utils-1.41-1.fc31.x86_64 installed.
Can you execute t1asm?
t1as
Hi all,
For about two weeks now, I'm unable to build and then merge translation
with stable, even after a fresh clone. I cannot believe it has something
to do with an upgrade from Fedora 30 to 31.
Tail of the log :
--8<--
cd ./out && /usr/bin/fontforge -script emmentaler-11.genpe
Copyright (c
Le 26/07/2019 à 09:44, Federico Bruni a écrit :
Jean-Charles, version 1.0.3 is now available in Fedora 30 repositories.
And version 1.1.0 is in rawhide.
As I've cloned the repository and built it without any problem,
everything is fine.
Cheers,
Jean-Charles
___
Il giorno lun 1 lug 2019 alle 8:03, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Yes, I run Fedora 30 since it was released and I can compile lilypond
without any problem using the package available in Fedora.
I've now built the rpm for version 1.0.3 and it works as well. I'll
submit the new version to the Fedo
Il giorno dom 30 giu 2019 alle 10:45, Jean-Charles Malahieude
ha scritto:
My first attempts were using the official Fedora package (as I do
since one is available), version 1.0.2. Facing this library problem,
I've built a package for 1.0.3 and then 1.1.0 which both bump the
wall.
Unfortunate
Le 30/06/2019 à 11:10, Knut Petersen a écrit :
Build it yourself. Building and installing extractpdfmark is an easy
an fast task.
Cloning the repository, building, testing and installing of
extractpdfmark takes less than 20 seconds here:
This, as intended, works like a charm, but I was expe
On 30.06.19 10:45, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't remember if my last merge was just before upgrading to
Fedora 30 or not. And Federico, who runs a Fedora 30 as well if I'm not
mistaken, pushed on Translation mid-June…
Build it yourself. Building and installing extract
Le 30/06/2019 à 02:51, Masamichi Hosoda a écrit :
In Fedora 30, I suggest to use extractpdfmark from package,
rather than self-built extractpdfmark.
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/extractpdfmark
If I understand correctly,
Fedora 30 has popler-0.73.0 package that has libpoppler.so.84.
ht
> Hello,
>
> Since I can't get a successful doc-build on my Fedora 30 box, I'm
> unable to check doc-changes and merge translation into stable.
>
> It's the same with extractpdfmark 1.0.2 1.0.3 and 1.1.0
>
> log spits:
>
> extractpdfmark -o ./out-www/collated-files.pdfmark
> ./out-www/collated-
Hello,
Since I can't get a successful doc-build on my Fedora 30 box, I'm unable
to check doc-changes and merge translation into stable.
It's the same with extractpdfmark 1.0.2 1.0.3 and 1.1.0
log spits:
extractpdfmark -o ./out-www/collated-files.pdfmark
./out-www/collated-files.tmp.pdf
extr
Hello
On 03/06/2019 12:29, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Werner!
OK. Do you have time to prepare a patch?
No time ... but attached is quick shot.
Min version 2.44 seems reasonable as we use it in gub.
Knut
Thanks
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5525/
James
___
Hi Werner!
OK. Do you have time to prepare a patch?
No time ... but attached is quick shot.
Min version 2.44 seems reasonable as we use it in gub.
Knut
>From 619de1764cd472ec7587f98c34ba7b7e613be93c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Knut Petersen
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:30:08 +0200
Subject:
> I think it is clear that we really need to test for and link against
> the glib-2.0 and gobject-2.0 libraries.
OK. Do you have time to prepare a patch?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
Hi Werner!
I always thought that `pkg-config' resolves dependencies recursively.
Even with your `pangoft2.pc' file it should check the dependencies in
`pango.fc', right? And there I see
Requires: glib-2.0 gobject-2.0
Tumbleweed also moved those dependencies to 'Require.private' ;-)
But I g
> pkg-config --libs "pangoft2 >= 1.38.0" gives
>
>-lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lfontconfig -lfreetype
Not for me. I get
-L/usr/local/lib64 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 \
-lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lfontconfig -lfreetype
> Weird. Look at /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/pangoft2.pc:
>
>prefix=/us
Hi Werner!
I added libgobject-2.0 to LIBS: "export LIBS='-lglib-2.0
-lgobject-2.0'", and after that building the lilypond executable
succeeded again.
Hmm. LilyPond doesn't explicitly test for glib; it relies on
PANGO_FT2_LIBS, which should always add those two libraries for
building the `lilypo
> After some time without building lilypond I realized that my
> openSuSE Tumbleweed system had changed enough to be unable to build
> lilypond with my old and proven script. The problem is that some
> required libraries are missing from the g++ command line that should
> produce the lilypond ex
Hi everybody!
After some time without building lilypond I realized that my openSuSE
Tumbleweed system had changed enough to be unable to build lilypond with my old
and proven script. The problem is that some required libraries are missing from
the g++ command line that should produce the lilyp
On 02/22/2010 08:52 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> Yes... it's always nice to have lily building with the latest and
> greatest - although I see that gcc-4.5.0 development currently has
> about 250 regressions, half of them serious ones. I'm not sure
> if debugging this right now is helpful.
>
>
Op maandag 22-02-2010 om 19:09 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
Hi Dave,
> lilypond is no longer building for openSUSE Factory due to the switch to
> gcc45. I noticed from the git logs that you have worked on
> spacing-spanner.cc recently which is where gcc45 fails.
Yes, I noticed.
I
On 2008/07/14 20:17 +, Mark Hanlon wrote:
> LILYPOND_REPO_URL=file://localhost/home/maz/lilypondbuilds/mygub/gub/PatchedLilySource
>
> # ugh - make this automatic.
> LILYPOND_DIRRED_BRANCH=localhost/home/maz/lilypondbuilds/mygub/gub/PatchedLilySource/$(LILYPOND_BRANCH)
> LILYPOND_FLATTENED_BRA
Hello,
I've been trying to use the local.build file that Han-Wen supplied to do a GUB
build of a patched version of lilypond for the music notation project.
I have amended the contents of the local.build file to point to the location of
my source code
which is
/home/maz/lilypondbuilds/mygub/gu
I asked about this with 2.9.22 and had no answer.
On FreeBSD RELEASE-6.1,
Failed to open: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb
This file is not in the bitstream-vera on my system.
Please, where can I get it or make it?
Ian
--
___
li
I have the following error trying to build 2.9.22 from source
on a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE system with bitstream-vera 1.10_2.
Cannot open /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb
The requested file, VeraBd.pfb, does not exist
Open: Failed to open: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/Ve
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
>> The problem is that lilypond's build system assumes that lilypond is
>> already installed on the system.
>>
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys said no, it uses LILYPONDPREFIX, but as I point out
>> in the thread, it is setting LILYPON
Re,
I have found why it builed for you and not on
my system.
The python version installed on my system was a
2.4 version. I had backported on a 2.3 version,
and the problem seem solved.
It will be interesting to know why there is this problem
with new versions of python, because if one
day Pytho
Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
The problem is that lilypond's build system assumes that lilypond is
already installed on the system.
Han-Wen Nienhuys said no, it uses LILYPONDPREFIX, but as I point out
in the thread, it is setting LILYPONDPREFIX *incorrectly*, and the
reason the builds are working
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:08:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
> >
> >> I'm distressed that nobody has bothered to fix the bug since then. In
> >> the thread on the mailing list you can see that if LILYPONDPRE
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
>
>> I'm distressed that nobody has bothered to fix the bug since then. In
>> the thread on the mailing list you can see that if LILYPONDPREFIX is
>> set correctly, the bug goes away.
>
> This issue has been addressed in
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
>
> >I'm distressed that nobody has bothered to fix the bug since then. In
> >the thread on the mailing list you can see that if LILYPONDPREFIX is
> >set correctly, the bug goes away.
>
> This issue
Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
I'm distressed that nobody has bothered to fix the bug since then. In
the thread on the mailing list you can see that if LILYPONDPREFIX is
set correctly, the bug goes away.
This issue has been addressed in a more robust manner in the 2.9 series,
and I would welco
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:57:14PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ludovic RESLINGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I saw in archive some messages about a problem to build lilypond in
> > debian unstable. I think this is not a problem of python's version, because
> > I tested to build with
Ludovic RESLINGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I saw in archive some messages about a problem to build lilypond in
> debian unstable. I think this is not a problem of python's version, because
> I tested to build with python2.4 and python2.5, and the problem stay the
> same:
>
> chmod 755 out/con
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:47:35PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> If you run
> scripts/out/convert-ly --help
> from the lilypond/ directory, you will get a much more informative
> error message that might
> help you find out what the problem is.
>
> /Mats
>
Hello
Thank you for your answer.
W
If you run
scripts/out/convert-ly --help
from the lilypond/ directory, you will get a much more informative
error message that might
help you find out what the problem is.
/Mats
Quoting Ludovic RESLINGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I saw in archive some messages about a problem to build li
Hello,
I saw in archive some messages about a problem to build lilypond in
debian unstable. I think this is not a problem of python's version, because
I tested to build with python2.4 and python2.5, and the problem stay the
same:
chmod 755 out/convert-ly
/usr/bin/perl /home/me/lilypond-2.8.4/buil
Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: cygwin build problem in mf
Peter Leschev writes:
I'm trying to build the latest from CVS under cygwin, and I'm
getting the following error. Any ideas?
Yes.
mv feta11.{pfa,pfb,svg} ./out
mv: cannot stat `feta11.{pfa,pfb,svg}&#
Peter Leschev writes:
> I'm trying to build the latest from CVS under cygwin, and I'm getting
> the following error. Any ideas?
Yes.
> mv feta11.{pfa,pfb,svg} ./out
> mv: cannot stat `feta11.{pfa,pfb,svg}': No such file or directory
{} is a bashism, use bash as /bin/sh, or try make SHE
Hi,
I'm trying to
build the latest from CVS under cygwin, and I'm getting the following error. Any
ideas?
Regards,
Peter
make[1]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/sandbox/org/lilypond/lilypond/mf'mftrace --encoding feta11.enc
--no-afm -I ./out/ --formats=pfa,pfb,svg feta11mftr
Again, Debian, Sid, 2.4.0.
rm -f ./out/lexer.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/lexer.dep ./out/lexer.o" g++ -c
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED -Iinclude -I./out -I../flower/include
-I../flower/./out -I../flower/include -O2 -finline-functions -g -pipe
-I/usr/include/python2.3 -O
Thus spake Christian Hitz:
>Am Dienstag den, 16. Juli 2002, um 11:45, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
>>
>>Please send a patch if you get it working, maybe addding small
>>comments as above.
>
>With the attached patch applied to the current CVS, you can build
>lilypond on MacOS X (and i hope also on d
Am Dienstag den, 16. Juli 2002, um 11:45, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
>
> Please send a patch if you get it working, maybe addding small
> comments as above.
With the attached patch applied to the current CVS, you can build
lilypond on MacOS X (and i hope also on darwin).
Jan: your hint did the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello. Long time listener, first time caller.
>
> I get the following error when building from the latest (well, this
> morning's) CVS:
Thanks for the report ; should be fixed in CVS.
> I'm using gcc v. 2.95, building on Apple Darwin 1.4.1. I have the
> Fink inst
Zach Brewster-Geisz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello. Long time listener, first time caller.
Loud and clear, over.
> I get the following error when building from the latest (well, this
> morning's) CVS:
> In file included from note-collision.cc:11:
> ../flower/include/drul-array.hh: In ins
Hello. Long time listener, first time caller.
I get the following error when building from the latest (well, this
morning's) CVS:
rm -f ./out/note-collision.dep;
DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/note-collision.dep ./out/note-collision.o"
c++ -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED -Iinclude -
> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Han-Wen> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> I just upped CVS, and when I run "make", I get:
Han-Wen> run make clean
Now I get:
makeinfo --output=./out/lilypond.info out/lilypond.nexi
out/lilypond.nexi:269: Node `Preface' requires a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just upped CVS, and when I run "make", I get:
run make clean
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/
I just upped CVS, and when I run "make", I get:
rm -f ./out/align-interface.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/align-interface.dep
./out/align-interface.o" c++ -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED -Iinclude
-I./out -I.././lib/include -I../lib/./out -I.././flower/include -I../flower/./out
-
63 matches
Mail list logo
