Ben Woods writes:
> On 30 April 2015 at 16:06, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Ben Woods writes:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I am trying to build lilypond 2.19.19 on FreeBSD, and getting the
>>> following build errors:
>>> In file included
On 30 April 2015 at 16:06, David Kastrup wrote:
> Ben Woods writes:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am trying to build lilypond 2.19.19 on FreeBSD, and getting the
>> following build errors:
>> In file included from ./include/smobs.hh:326:
>> ./include/smobs.t
Ben Woods writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to build lilypond 2.19.19 on FreeBSD, and getting the
> following build errors:
> In file included from ./include/smobs.hh:326:
> ./include/smobs.tcc:151:18: error: no matching function for call to
> 'scm_c_defi
Hi everyone,
I am trying to build lilypond 2.19.19 on FreeBSD, and getting the
following build errors:
In file included from ./include/smobs.hh:326:
./include/smobs.tcc:151:18: error: no matching function for call to
'scm_c_define_gsubr'
SCM subr = scm_c_define_gsubr (Super::type_
On 4/24/10 12:59 AM, "Marc Weber" wrote:
> Excerpts from Werner LEMBERG's message of Sat Apr 24 04:49:07 + 2010:
>>
>>> I thought that make distclean would put my build tree in the same
>>> state as it would be in a freshly cloned repository.
>>
>> Do `git status' to find out whether the
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> I thought that make distclean would put my build tree in the same
>> state as it would be in a freshly cloned repository.
IIRC distclean only calls clean, not doc-clean. I _think_ that you
can get a tree back to a fresh state by doing:
Excerpts from Werner LEMBERG's message of Sat Apr 24 04:49:07 + 2010:
>
> > I thought that make distclean would put my build tree in the same
> > state as it would be in a freshly cloned repository.
>
> Do `git status' to find out whether there are still additional files
> in your repository
> I thought that make distclean would put my build tree in the same
> state as it would be in a freshly cloned repository.
Do `git status' to find out whether there are still additional files
in your repository after `make distclean'. Of course, this doesn't
show the files which are ignored by p
Hi all,
I'd appreciate any ideas you could give me about resolving a build error I
have in my main lilypond build directory.
I've done
git reset --hard master
make distclean
./autogen.sh
make
make doc
I get the following error when I do make doc:
/Users/Carl/lilypond/Documentation/out-www
On 2009-08-30, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Here are my configuration settings for FontForge on a i586 GNU/Linux
> > box: [...]
> >
> > --enable-double
>
> IIRC, this option is the very one which makes the problems disappear.
> Hmm. Perhaps it's better to write to the various distri
> Here are my configuration settings for FontForge on a i586 GNU/Linux
> box: [...]
>
> --enable-double
IIRC, this option is the very one which makes the problems disappear.
Hmm. Perhaps it's better to write to the various distribution
packagers, urging them to compile FontForge wi
> Hmm. I've seen these errors for a long time now (maybe a year and a
> half), and I'm always using the latest fontforge tarball.
>
> Testing CVS, I get similar errors, first appearing with feta11:
Interesting. I haven't seen them since a long time. Please report
this to the FontForge list. H
On 2009-08-28, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
> > contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
> > error is printed.
>
> They are contradictions, thus the internal error. It's a rounding
> issue in FontForge.
>
> > Executable
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:55:41AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Executable based on sources from 00:29 GMT 29-Apr-2008.
> > Library based on sources from 20:49 GMT 30-Apr-2008.
>
> This is ooold. I've compiled the current CVS of FontForge by myself,
> and I don't see this (and I haven't see
> I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
> contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
> error is printed.
They are contradictions, thus the internal error. It's a rounding
issue in FontForge.
> Executable based on sources from 00:29 GMT 29-Apr-2008.
> Libra
I have no idea what "monotonic", "needed", "unneeded", and
"Expected" mean in this context, but the following messages are
certainly amusing. :)
I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
error is printed.
Invoking "font
16 matches
Mail list logo
