>> IMHO, VERSION_DEVEL should be be 2.13.58 also.
>
> No.
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/minor-release-checklist
OK. Maybe it's a one-time glitch for unknown reasons (since I haven't
experienced this previously).
Werner
__
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> -PATCH_LEVEL=57
> +PATCH_LEVEL=58
> MY_PATCH_LEVEL=
> VERSION_STABLE=2.12.3
> -VERSION_DEVEL=2.13.56
> +VERSION_DEVEL=2.13.57
>
>
> IMHO, VERSION_DEVEL should be be 2.13.58 also.
No.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentatio
This looks wrong to me:
-PATCH_LEVEL=57
+PATCH_LEVEL=58
MY_PATCH_LEVEL=
VERSION_STABLE=2.12.3
-VERSION_DEVEL=2.13.56
+VERSION_DEVEL=2.13.57
IMHO, VERSION_DEVEL should be be 2.13.58 also. I had to manually adjust
/usr/local/bin/convert-ly:
for d in ['/usr/local/share/lilypond/2.13.58',
