David Kastrup wrote:
>Do you intend creating a fix for issue 3204?
The fix is to perform the single expression substitution that I described,
on the line identified by the error message, which is the only place such
an expression appears. I thought my description was clear enough, but as
it's not
Zefram writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda
>>> # #)):
>>> articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to
>>> #
>
> Oh, hmm. Oops. The expression
>
> (map (lambda (alt) (list (ly:music-deep-copy body) alt)))
>
> shoul
David Kastrup wrote:
>> articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)):
>> articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #
Oh, hmm. Oops. The expression
(map (lambda (alt) (list (ly:music-deep-copy body) alt)))
should be
(map (lambda (alt) (li
Il 24/02/2013 16:02, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Can the bug team register a bug for it? If we don't get a response in
about two days from the original author, I'd suggest reverting it.
added as:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3204
--
Federico
__
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> [cd03b4ac]
>
>
> I just got this:
>
> articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)):
> articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #
>
> using this input:
>
> \version "2.17.13"
>
> \include "articulate.ly"
>
> \relative c' {
>
[cd03b4ac]
I just got this:
articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)):
articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to #
using this input:
\version "2.17.13"
\include "articulate.ly"
\relative c' {
\unfoldRepeats \articulate {
\repeat vol
