On Friday 05 May 2006 11:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Erik stopped including submitter's emails in the bug CVS to avoid them
> > getting spammed; he simply kept a mailbox of bug emails, and when an
>
> has this been a real problem or a pr
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> has this been a real problem or a preemptive strike? I wonder whether
> spammers also harvest CVS repositories.
As as spammer, I would ;-)
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.
Graham Percival wrote:
Erik stopped including submitter's emails in the bug CVS to avoid them
getting spammed; he simply kept a mailbox of bug emails, and when an
has this been a real problem or a preemptive strike? I wonder whether
spammers also harvest CVS repositories.
--
Ha
x27;s
fixed, but we don't want those addresses spammed.
The submitter's address is there, but I think it's usually not
obfuscated.
Could it be made obfuscated or private?
Erik stopped including submitter's emails in the bug CVS to avoid them
getting spammed; he simply k
Graham Percival wrote:
When we set up the bug tracker, could each bug have a "submitter's
email" field, which is only viewable by admins? We should keep track of
who submitted each bug so that they can be notified when it's fixed, but
we don't want those addresses spammed.
The submitter's ad
When we set up the bug tracker, could each bug have a "submitter's
email" field, which is only viewable by admins? We should keep track
of who submitted each bug so that they can be notified when it's fixed,
but we don't want those addresses spammed.
Cheers,
- Graham
__
