[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > If my analysis is correct, I suggest to call
> > > Lookup:round_filled_box only if the bar line is visible -- maybe
> > > there are other, similar situations in the lilypond code.
> >
> > Fixed in CVS.
>
> Thanks. I've changed the `<' to `<=' in my local copy of t
> > If my analysis is correct, I suggest to call
> > Lookup:round_filled_box only if the bar line is visible -- maybe
> > there are other, similar situations in the lilypond code.
>
> Fixed in CVS.
Thanks. I've changed the `<' to `<=' in my local copy of the 2.2.5
also (you will backport this, w
> > Note that adding a Staff_symbol_engraver with making the staff
> > invisible later on doesn't give a correct layout.
>
> Interesting. Can you give an example?
I used the wrong words, sorry. You get the expected result (assume
that the top staff is the invisible one):
|
|
|_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If my analysis is correct, I suggest to call Lookup:round_filled_box
> only if the bar line is visible -- maybe there are other, similar
> situations in the lilypond code.
Fixed in CVS.
> Note that adding a Staff_symbol_engraver with making the staff
> invisible later
[lilypond 2.2.5]
I have done this:
\context {
\ScoreContext
\accepts "Top"
}
\context {
\name "Top"
\alias "Staff"
\type "Engraver_group_engraver"
\consists "Output_property_engraver"
\consists "Bar_engraver"
\consists "Font_size_engr
