On 8/20/11 3:40 PM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote:
>
> What about
>
> O. O O. O
> || ||
> | -| | -|
> ++--++
>
> Does this work correctly also?
Yes. See attached PNG.
>
On 8/20/11 2:53 PM, "Mike Solomon" wrote:
> Can you send a test case without dots (i.e. \ti
> The good news is, I think I have a fix for that bug (and it's only 5
> years old).
Great!
> But before I push a patch for review, I'd like to verify that the
> beamlet is in the right position on all of notes in the attached
> png.
Making the beamlet always point to the dot looks OK.
Wha
It looks good.
Is this also working with complex cases such as { \times 4/5 { a8 a32 a8
a16. a8 a8 } } ?
I think (not sure) the beamlets should be: 32 to the right, 16. to the left.
Bertrand
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://
Can you send a test case without dots (i.e. \times 4/5 { c8 [ c16 c8 c16 c8 c8
] } to see if that's changed in the new patch ?
Cheers,
MS
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> For several weeks now, I've been working in fits and starts, with lots of
> dead ends, on the oldest bug
For several weeks now, I've been working in fits and starts, with lots of
dead ends, on the oldest bug in the LilyPond issue tracker -- issue #11
Beamlet on wrong side of tuplet sixteenth.
The good news is, I think I have a fix for that bug (and it's only 5 years
old).
But before I push a pat
