Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-30 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Dan, 2008/10/1 Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The "0/0" message occurs in 2.11.59, but not in 2.11.58. > -- Dan This looks like a string conversion failure following the update of the rational code to 64 bit (implemented in 2.11.59). Here's the code from flower/string_convert.cc (which was a

Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-30 Thread Dan Eble
The "0/0" message occurs in 2.11.59, but not in 2.11.58. -- Dan On 28 Sep 2008, at 14:26, Dan Eble wrote: I'm running the version from http://lilypond.org/web/install/#2.11 which is labeled "MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs) 10.3 and newer" on 10.5.5 (the latest). When I get time, I'll try to n

Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-28 Thread Dan Eble
I'm running the version from http://lilypond.org/web/install/#2.11 which is labeled "MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs) 10.3 and newer" on 10.5.5 (the latest). When I get time, I'll try to narrow it down to a specific version for you. -- Dan On 28 Sep 2008, at 14:18, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2

Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/9/28 Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here's the whole file for now. It's not that I mind narrowing down the > problem for you; I just can't do it today. Let me know if you need a more > restricted example. when compiling the whole file, I get two 3/4 barchecks warnings, but no 0/0. Strange.

Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-28 Thread Francisco Vila
2008/9/28 Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here's the whole file for now. It's not that I mind narrowing down the > problem for you; I just can't do it today. Let me know if you need a more > restricted example. > On 28 Sep 2008, at 13:09, Valentin Villenave wrote: >> When I try only the sample y

Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-28 Thread Dan Eble
Here's the whole file for now. It's not that I mind narrowing down the problem for you; I just can't do it today. Let me know if you need a more restricted example. tr8_Les_Rameaux.ly Description: Binary data -- Dan On 28 Sep 2008, at 13:09, Valentin Villenave wrote: 2008/9/28 Dan

Re: barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/9/28 Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Obviously "4" instead of "r4" is a typo, but where does "0/0" come from? When I try only the sample you gave, I've got a 3/4 barcheck error (not 0/0); could you post a complete file (or at least one that reproduces the warning)? Cheers, Valentin __

barcheck failed at: 0/0

2008-09-28 Thread Dan Eble
Just upgraded to 2.11.60 (from 57 maybe?), and got this unusual error. src/transcriptions/tr8_Les_Rameaux.ly:29:64: warning: barcheck failed at: 0/0 gf,4 f) bf~ \times 2/3 { bf8 c df } | ef4 r ef, r | af r af 4 Obviously "4" instead of "r4" is a typo, but where