Re: anomalies with 2.1.32

2004-03-21 Thread David Bobroff
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 12:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I'm having similar trouble reproducing the oddities with smaller files. > > Most of the really strange things I was having have disappeared as of > > ChangLog 1.1917; I'm not seeing the disembodied beams etc, in t

Re: anomalies with 2.1.32

2004-03-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm having similar trouble reproducing the oddities with smaller files. > Most of the really strange things I was having have disappeared as of > ChangLog 1.1917; I'm not seeing the disembodied beams etc, in that file > of mine. I am, however, still having some strang

Re: anomalies with 2.1.32

2004-03-21 Thread David Bobroff
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 11:42, Matthias Kilian wrote: > [Changed to development list, since it's really a bleeding-edge issue] > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:43:34PM +, David Bobroff wrote: > > I'm still getting those same anomalies with v2.1.32; that is, dismbodied > > beams, multimeasure rest

Re: anomalies with 2.1.32

2004-03-21 Thread Matthias Kilian
[Changed to development list, since it's really a bleeding-edge issue] On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:43:34PM +, David Bobroff wrote: > I'm still getting those same anomalies with v2.1.32; that is, dismbodied > beams, multimeasure rest numbers displaced to the right, etc. [...] Me, too :-( For e