2008/5/12 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/5/11 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> If Han-Wen and Jan agree, I guess a good solution could be putting
>> robots.txt at root of lilypond.org, so it would contain:
>>
>> Disallow: doc/v1.6/
>> ...etc...
>
> Yes, writing "etc" doe
2008/5/11 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If Han-Wen and Jan agree, I guess a good solution could be putting
> robots.txt at root of lilypond.org, so it would contain:
>
> Disallow: doc/v1.6/
> ...etc...
Yes, writing "etc" does make it look more elegant :-)
I agree that major releases
On 2008/05/11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> John, I'm not familiar enough with the way the docs are interfaced
> with the website, wan you help me on this? My best guess would be
> something like:
>
> User-Agent: *
> Disallow: /@[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> Disallow: /@[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> Disallow: /@[EMA
2008/5/11 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John, Valentin: could you add a robots.txt to the website so that
> google doesn't look at docs before 2.10 ? It might be useful to have
> these ancient docs available for archive, but we don't want google
> indexing them.
Definitely!
John, I
This is documentation from version 1.6, which is probably about 8 years
old.
John, Valentin: could you add a robots.txt to the website so that
google doesn't look at docs before 2.10 ? It might be useful to have
these ancient docs available for archive, but we don't want google
indexing them.
Ch
