> > > Modern music has a lot of new notation, and many of them are good
> > > and intuitive. For example, accelerando can be marked with
> > > increasing number of bars (here only two notes are shown).
> > >
> > >/|
> > > -<-|
> > > | \|
> > > | |
> > > | O
> > > O
> > >
> > > Here the pro
> > As a diatonic stave, a cromatic stave would have five lines, starting from
> > c'':
> >
> > c'' -O-
> > b' O
> > ais' -O---
> > a' O
> > gis' -O---
> > gO
> > fis' -O---
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> The problem is that there are many different opinions on how a staff for
> contemporary music should look like. To me, suggestions often give the
> impression of people carrying out a silly contest of who has the fanciest
> idea for a new notation syste
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
> ...
> I just figured out that in modern music the diatonic stave (seven pitches
> for chromatic scale in a stave) is not adequate to represent always
> dodecafonic music.
Agreed; the ordinary staff notation as implemented in lily was developed
Now that 2.0 is out, one should think what to put in 2.2.
Modern music has a lot of possibilities, which basically give more freedom
to a composer to express their music. I'll present here the idea of a
dodecafonic stave which could be used instead of the diatonic stave.
I just figured out that i
