On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:48:23PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> John Mandereau a écrit :
>> People should never be bored by manually editing snippets in input/new
>> to write them in input/lsr, as this can be handled automatically by
>> makelsr, but there are some formatting requirements for
John Mandereau a écrit :
John Mandereau a écrit :
People should never be bored by manually editing snippets in
input/new to write them in input/lsr, as this can be handled
automatically by makelsr, but there are some formatting requirements
for stuff in input/new that are not necessary for reg
John Mandereau a écrit :
People should never be bored by manually editing snippets in input/new
to write them in input/lsr, as this can be handled automatically by
makelsr, but there are some formatting requirements for stuff in
input/new that are not necessary for regression tests, e.g. taggin
Graham Percival a écrit :
Not only that, but with a minimum of effort. IMO, people adding
new features should only be required to write one .ly file (for
input/regression/ ); they shouldn't need to do any other manual
tweaking to get a snippet in input/lsr/.
I partially agree. People should
2009/4/18 Graham Percival :
> LSR should be the latest stable, which means 2.12.something.
> Valentin is supposed to be coordinating this with Sebastiano, but
> he's off spending time on other things right now.
> *scowl*
OK, you win. I'm giving Seba a ping right now.
Regards,
Valentin
On 4/18/09 9:53 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> Mao, aren't I a genius for setting this up two years ago? ;)
Yes, you are, obviously (another quote for Valentin). ;)
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
> PS about a year ago, I had exactly the same discussion with Mats.
> I'm going to bet that it'l
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:32:10AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/18/09 9:24 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> >> Why is it harder to leave the old version up than to take it down when we
> >> move to the new stable version? What am I missing?
> >
> > Time. What happens if somebody ad
On 4/18/09 9:24 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:06:34AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/18/09 8:57 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> No, no -- when a programmer writes a regtest for a new feature,
>>> the minimal "documentation" work is that he copies i
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:06:34AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/18/09 8:57 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > No, no -- when a programmer writes a regtest for a new feature,
> > the minimal "documentation" work is that he copies it or runs a
> > python script or something to put it in
On 4/18/09 8:57 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:26:57AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/18/09 6:03 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>
>> One of the issues with regtests is that when a bug is found, a regtest is
>> added to demonstrate the bug, and then w
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:26:57AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/18/09 6:03 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:39:07PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > Not only that, but with a minimum of effort. IMO, people adding
> > new features should only be required
On 4/18/09 6:03 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:39:07PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/17/09 9:16 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> That said, I must admit that CG 5 doesn't go into details of how
>>> to manually deal with input/new to input/lsr. The
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:39:07PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/17/09 9:16 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > That said, I must admit that CG 5 doesn't go into details of how
> > to manually deal with input/new to input/lsr. The format changes
> > slightly. It's dealt with the pytho
On 4/17/09 9:16 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:38:22PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> In order to build my docs, I copied the file from input/new to input/lsr.
>>
>> I thought that the doc build process would get files from input/new if they
>> didn't exist i
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:38:22PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> In order to build my docs, I copied the file from input/new to input/lsr.
>
> I thought that the doc build process would get files from input/new if they
> didn't exist in input/lsr.
>
> Can you summarize the process for me?
15 matches
Mail list logo
