On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:30 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Ah, I think I remember that somebody told me that the important thing
> was the convert-ly rule, and that the automatic procedures would take
> care of the rest.
That makes sense. Yes, those changes came from convert-ly. I'll push it soon.
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>>> Is this a good change?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Graham
>>> From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>
>> Should think so. How did I overlook that?
>
> Ju
On 10/4/10 11:18 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> Is this a good change?
Yes. convert-ly should have made these changes automatically, I think.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> Is this a good change?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Graham
>> From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
> Should think so. How did I overlook that?
Judging from the version strings, nobody's
Graham Percival writes:
> Is this a good change?
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
> From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Should think so. How did I overlook that?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-de
Is this a good change?
Cheers,
- Graham
From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Graham Percival
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:16:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: update accordion glyphs.
---
Documentation/notation/text.itely |8
1 files changed, 4 inse
