On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:25:46 +0100
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 07:42 -0800, Graham Percival escribi__:
> > This is in the bug tracker, but there isn't much info yet. Could
> > you add those error messages to it?
> >
> > I think it's number 536 or so.
>
El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 07:42 -0800, Graham Percival escribió:
> This is in the bug tracker, but there isn't much info yet. Could
> you add those error messages to it?
>
> I think it's number 536 or so.
Yes, 536 is for the font error, but remember that there are two bugs,
one for the font (new i
This is in the bug tracker, but there isn't much info yet. Could
you add those error messages to it?
I think it's number 536 or so.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:11:53 +0100
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/12/17, Cesar Penagos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I'm win.
2007/12/17, Cesar Penagos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm win. XP user, and recently upgrade from 2.11.34 to 2.11.36. and for my
> surprise the fonts are totally changed in this version; from the very nice
> Century; to an horrendous Arial or maybe Courier font in the time
> signatures, the text all, an
2007/12/17, Cesar Penagos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm win. XP user, and recently upgrade from 2.11.34 to 2.11.36. and for my
> surprise the fonts are totally changed in this version; from the very nice
> Century; to an horrendous Arial or maybe Courier font in the time
> signatures, the text all,
