2008/3/4, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Okay, I now took a look at the code and in Tuplet_number::print, there is a
> > hardcoded check that kills the tuplet number if the tuplet "does not take
> > up any time". In my eyes, this is wrong, since then there is no visual
> > in
Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Am Sonntag, 23. Dezember 2007 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> > Hi,
> > Schubert's Stabat Mater (D.383) contains lots of measures (3/4 time),
> > where each beat is a eighth-tremolo using an additional triplet, ie. in
> > lilypond notation:
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> > I print tuplet brackets over one-note tuplets relatively frequently in
> my
> > own scores. Can we make sure that printing tuplet brackets over one-note
> > tuplets remai
Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> I print tuplet brackets over one-note tuplets relatively frequently in my
> own scores. Can we make sure that printing tuplet brackets over one-note
> tuplets remains an option for composers wanting to use it?
What do you mean by "remains an option"? Li
2008/2/25 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Sonntag, 23. Dezember 2007 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> > Hi,
> > Schubert's Stabat Mater (D.383) contains lots of measures (3/4 time),
> where
> > each beat is a eighth-tremolo using an additional triplet, ie. in
> lilypond
> > notation:
> >
Am Sonntag, 23. Dezember 2007 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Hi,
> Schubert's Stabat Mater (D.383) contains lots of measures (3/4 time), where
> each beat is a eighth-tremolo using an additional triplet, ie. in lilypond
> notation:
> \times 2/3 { a4.:8 } \times 4/6 {a2.:8} |
>
> If I use this
