On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:58, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
> > 2006-03-30 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * lily/chord-tremolo-engraver.cc (acknowledge_stem): set the
> > stem-tremolo object in the stem (or else the stem might not be
> > long enough).
>
> just a minor n
Joe Neeman wrote:
2006-03-30 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lily/chord-tremolo-engraver.cc (acknowledge_stem): set the
stem-tremolo object in the stem (or else the stem might not be
long enough).
just a minor nit, but can you follow the ChangeLog style exactly? ie.
tab for ind
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:59, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos
> > >
> > > > on whole notes. I'll fix that today.
>
> And here a problem with \stemUp, using the CVS from today, 7:23 CEST.
Nothing to do with \stemUp, it's because you used \repeat "t
> > I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos
> > > on whole notes. I'll fix that today.
And here a problem with \stemUp, using the CVS from today, 7:23 CEST.
Werner
==
\relative c'' {
\stemUp \repeat
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:55, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
> I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos
> > on whole notes. I'll fix that today.
>
> Please do.
Here we are:
2006-03-30 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lily/stem-tremolo.cc (print): for whole notes
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
thanks. I've added your changes to 2.9 ; I'll probably backport the diff
of 2.9.0 to 2.8.1 as a whole.
Before you do, I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos on
whole notes. I'll fix that today.
Please d
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> thanks. I've added your changes to 2.9 ; I'll probably backport the diff
> of 2.9.0 to 2.8.1 as a whole.
Before you do, I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos on
whole notes. I'll fix that today.
> Can you look at the regtes
Please note that the property name "style" currently (hopefully)
consistently denotes _font_ style. It is defined with this meaning for
noteheads, rests, accidentals, time signatures, flags, and custos.
Nowadays, that Lily supports subproperties (cp. manual Sect. 9.1.4 or
9.2.1), maybe, on
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:20, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Can you resend the patch using more idiomatic code? Thanks!
Also, can you include a small regression test sample, so it's obvious
when we break something?
I'm not quite sure if we reached a conclusio
minlen -= 1.0;
- }
+{
+ Real beam_trans = Stem_tremolo::get_beam_translation (t_flag);
+ /* the obvious choice is (durlog - 2) here, but we need a bit more space. */
+ minlen += 2 * (durlog - 1.5) * beam_trans;
+
+ /* up-stems need even a little mo
This is great to know.
While I am still learning syntax, etc. of lilypond, perhaps the first
thing I can volunteer to do in the near future is program some of the
more common (or attainable) house style sheets. Like I said, I
believe I have the Durand sheet somewhere. If anyone else out the
On 28-Mar-06, at 3:56 PM, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
If you're new here, you may not realise that almost everything in
lilypond is
configurable. As things stand, you can do
Of course... I have only started working through the tutorial... so
perhaps I should just keep a little quiet until I kno
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:41, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
Ignoring modern style sheets means not being able to type-set for
those companies. Which also means using Finale or Sibelius.
Or, perhaps this can be configurable. Maybe a stylesheet could be
loaded?
If you're new here, you may not realise tha
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:41, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
> Ignoring modern style sheets means not being able to type-set for
> those companies. Which also means using Finale or Sibelius.
>
> Or, perhaps this can be configurable. Maybe a stylesheet could be
> loaded?
If you're new here, you may not realis
Joshua Parmenter wrote:
Ignoring modern style sheets means not being able to type-set for those
companies. Which also means using Finale or Sibelius.
Or, perhaps this can be configurable. Maybe a stylesheet could be loaded?
Yes, of course. I was thinking of the correct default.
And I apologi
Ignoring modern style sheets means not being able to type-set for
those companies. Which also means using Finale or Sibelius.
Or, perhaps this can be configurable. Maybe a stylesheet could be
loaded?
And I apologize for not introducing myself and my situation. I was
directed here from a M
Joshua Parmenter wrote:
I'll do this tonight (when I'm home with my scanner).
Looking over some older scores, I definitely see examples like the one
sent earlier... but over 10 years of typesetting, most current style
sheets (if memory serves me correctly) specify slanted tremolos. I'll
actua
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:26, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
> I'll do this tonight (when I'm home with my scanner).
>
> Looking over some older scores, I definitely see examples like the
> one sent earlier... but over 10 years of typesetting, most current
> style sheets (if memory serves me correctly) speci
I'll do this tonight (when I'm home with my scanner).
Looking over some older scores, I definitely see examples like the
one sent earlier... but over 10 years of typesetting, most current
style sheets (if memory serves me correctly) specify slanted
tremolos. I'll actually see if I can dig u
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:39, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
> This is described in Matt Stone's book "Music Notation in the 20th
> Century" (not just 20th century music notation, but the practices of
> notation in the 20th century):
>
> "The tremolo bars should be thinner than beams, and as long or a
> litt
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> "The tremolo bars should be thinner than beams,
>
> Urgh. Never seen that in normal scores from German publishers.
I think that I have seen thicker than beams, in some publications.
>> On beamed notes, the tremolo bars usually slant sightly more than
>> the beams Note
> "The tremolo bars should be thinner than beams,
Urgh. Never seen that in normal scores from German publishers.
> On beamed notes, the tremolo bars usually slant sightly more than
> the beams Note that the tremolo bars always slant upward, regardless
> of beam- slant"
Hmmm.
> Mostly, you wan
This is described in Matt Stone's book "Music Notation in the 20th
Century" (not just 20th century music notation, but the practices of
notation in the 20th century):
"The tremolo bars should be thinner than beams, and as long or a
little longer than the width of a note-head
On beamed notes
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Can you resend the patch using more idiomatic code? Thanks!
Also, can you include a small regression test sample, so it's obvious
when we break something?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for
Joe Neeman wrote:
+ Real height_of_my_trem = 0.0;
+ Grob *trem = unsmob_grob (me->get_object ("tremolo-flag"));
+ if (trem)
+ height_of_my_trem = ly_scm2interval (trem->get_property
("Y-extent")).length ()
+/* hack a bit of space around the trem. */
++ beam_translation -
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:01, Joshua Parmenter wrote:
> Shouldn't all tremolo lines be at the same angle (usually about 30
> degrees)?
>
> Sorry, I am new to the list, and am not sure where this thread
> started. But in standard notation, this is not what usual tremolo
> markings look like.
I started
> Shouldn't all tremolo lines be at the same angle (usually about 30
> degrees)?
AFAIK, this isn't true in the presence of beams. Can you provide a
counterexample (this is, a small scanned image)? In that case we have
to make it configurable.
Werner
___
> I've tweaked it by adding a little more to the minimum length of the
> stem. The Franck output is unchanged, I've attached the new
> Tchaikovsky output.
Very nice!
> Oh, and I remembered a ChangeLog entry this time :)
Please add it just to the mail and don't include it into the diff
directly.
Shouldn't all tremolo lines be at the same angle (usually about 30
degrees)?
Sorry, I am new to the list, and am not sure where this thread
started. But in standard notation, this is not what usual tremolo
markings look like.
Josh
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:43, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > It seems this issue doesn't bother anyone else? In any case, now
> > that 2.8 is out there, I thought I'd start pushing this point again.
> > I attach a patch that gives the behaviour that I think is correct.
> > I also attach 2 examples of the d
> It seems this issue doesn't bother anyone else? In any case, now
> that 2.8 is out there, I thought I'd start pushing this point again.
> I attach a patch that gives the behaviour that I think is correct.
> I also attach 2 examples of the differences between the existing and
> the proposed behav
It seems this issue doesn't bother anyone else? In any case, now that 2.8 is
out there, I thought I'd start pushing this point again. I attach a patch
that gives the behaviour that I think is correct. I also attach 2 examples of
the differences between the existing and the proposed behaviours.
32 matches
Mail list logo
