On 28 May 2010 17:48, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> Shouldn't we open an issue about this on the tracker, at least to
> keep track on this discussion and your very interesting proposal?
I should have a patch sorted later, so there's no need to log this on
the tracker. Once I've refreshed the (approve
2010/5/15 Neil Puttock :
> Should be pretty simple to do, I'd imagine.
>
> I postponed pushing the fix for #305 since I wanted to incorporate
> some additional features (automatic breaking for \change Staff and
> manual directions), but I'd be happy to work on those features later
> to get this fi
2010/5/15 Neil Puttock :
> This looks like a similar problem to issue 305. It would be trivial
> to enhance the patch I posted for this to break the alignment spanner
> if the engraver acknowledges a DynamicTextSpanner and 'dash-period is
> negative.
Great news!
(finally an issue I complain abou
On 15 May 2010 16:50, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Actually, I never liked the hack to set 'dash-period to a negative value.
I agree.
> To me it would seem much more natural to use the 'style property, i.e.
>
> \override DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none
>
> Of course, that would need to be
Am Samstag, 15. Mai 2010, um 14:19:43 schrieben Sie:
> On 14 May 2010 18:06, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > It's still on my list of things to do should I ever get enough time,
> > though. (Which is probably never, so I would encourage everyone to look
> > at this bug...)
>
> This looks like a sim
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Welcome to the club... I ran into that problem two years ago, and I haven't
> yet found a solution:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-03/msg00232.html
re my last email about temporary bug squad members from 30 se
