Re: Switch to Python 3.x (issue 545370043 by jonas.hahnf...@gmail.com)

2019-12-20 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
As I said on the mailing list multiple times, it's actually a ton of work to make the scripts work with Python 2 _and_ Python 3 at the same time. [...] I've forgotten that you've already added Python 3.x support to gub, so I withdraw my comments :-) https://codereview.appspot.com/545370043/

Re: Switch to Python 3.x (issue 545370043 by jonas.hahnf...@gmail.com)

2019-12-20 Thread jonas . hahnfeld
Reviewers: lemzwerg, Message: On 2019/12/20 00:12:25, lemzwerg wrote: Mhmm, I'm not happy with that. What I can imagine is to *prefer* Python 3.x over 2.x. Is there a reason to enforce 3.x? I thought that all of your recent work was to ensure that the scripts work both with 2.x and 3.x

Switch to Python 3.x (issue 545370043 by jonas.hahnf...@gmail.com)

2019-12-19 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
Mhmm, I'm not happy with that. What I can imagine is to *prefer* Python 3.x over 2.x. Is there a reason to enforce 3.x? I thought that all of your recent work was to ensure that the scripts work both with 2.x and 3.x – am I missing something? https://codereview.appspot.com/545370043/