On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:27:08PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.
>
> That's ok, this should be fixed; I'll apply your patches.
Here's yet another one I missed (I had to install a recent makeinfo
before building documentation):
--- stepmake/stepma
Matthias Kilian writes:
> Well, I just see that I didn't mention that I'm working on
> LilyPond-2.4.x. There you have prefix = $(DESTDIR)@prefix@ in
> config.make.in, so pretty everything is prefixed by DESTDIR.
Ah, yes; that's quite broken. The problems you see are caused by
a bit too casual te
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm, that's strange. I can't seem to find where
> local_lilypond_datadir would get the DESTDIR prefix, unless it would
> be from $prefix.
Well, I just see that I didn't mention that I'm working on
LilyPond-2.4.x. There you have
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm, that's strange. I can't seem to find where
> local_lilypond_datadir would get the DESTDIR prefix, unless it would
> be from $prefix. You wouldn't be specifying them both, like
>
> make install prefix=../fake-i386/usr/p
Matthias Kilian writes:
> Without the patch, some file go to
> /usr/ports//fake-i386/usr/ports//fake-i386, i.e. DESTDIR
> seems to be allready contained in local-lilypond_datadir.
Ok, then that is the bug, the fix is in the wrong place. I'll have a
look, thanks for the report.
Hmm, that
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > - -$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > - (cd $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
> > + -$(INSTALL) -d $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > + (cd $(local_lilypond_dat
Matthias Kilian writes:
> # teTeX-2.0.x compatibility.
> local-install:
> - -$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> - (cd $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
> + -$(INSTALL) -d $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> + (cd $(local_lily
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:54:58PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> could anyone check wether the attached diffs are sane? I need them
> for Matt's OpenBSD ports.
Sorry, I'm probably a little bit too drunk ;-) here are the patches.
$OpenBSD$
--- mf/GNUmakefile.orig Sat Feb 12 13:04:41 2005
+++ mf/G
Hi,
could anyone check wether the attached diffs are sane? I need them
for Matt's OpenBSD ports.
Ciao,
Kili
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
