Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arvid Grøtting wrote:
>> Is it possible to let auto-beaming be performed by an arbitrary scheme
>> function?
>>
> It is performed by a Scheme function, so you can just write your own and do
> \set Score.autoBeamCheck = #my-own-auto-beaming-function
2008/3/5, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Your attempt can be simplified, see below. However, after having tried it
> on a simple example, I'm no longer so convinced that it's a good idea, since
> you typically might want the notes before the breath to be beamed together,
> whereas the (eq
Arvid Grøtting wrote:
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes. So long for implementing this in the sources; nevertheless I'll
add it to the LSR anyway... unless you have another idea how LilyPond
could do that in a smarter way?
Is it possible to let auto-beaming be per
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes. So long for implementing this in the sources; nevertheless I'll
> add it to the LSR anyway... unless you have another idea how LilyPond
> could do that in a smarter way?
Is it possible to let auto-beaming be performed by an arbitrary scheme
2008/3/5, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Your attempt can be simplified, see below. However, after having tried it
> on a simple example, I'm no longer so convinced that it's a good idea, since
> you typically might want the notes before the breath to be beamed together,
> whereas the (eq
Your attempt can be simplified, see below. However, after having tried it
on a simple example, I'm no longer so convinced that it's a good idea, since
you typically might want the notes before the breath to be beamed together,
whereas the (equivalent of ) \noBeam removes the beam completely.
This
2008/3/5, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Changing the default behaviour to always include the equivalent of \noBeam
> is very easy, just add a line to the definition of \breathe in
> ly/music-functions-init.ly
I tried to achieve it but it's the first time I write such an advanced funct
Valentin Villenave wrote:
Hi everybody,
Damien, a French user, has posted the following suggestion on the -fr
list; I forward it here because he seems to have a good point.
"I never beam two eighth notes if they're separated with a \breathe
sign; however, as LilyPond currently ignores it, I of
Hi everybody,
Damien, a French user, has posted the following suggestion on the -fr
list; I forward it here because he seems to have a good point.
"I never beam two eighth notes if they're separated with a \breathe
sign; however, as LilyPond currently ignores it, I often have to
manually remove t
