Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Lily devel" ; "David Kastrup" ; "KarlinHigh" Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 8:50 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 13:41 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > The website is now also updated - I had previously forgotten that I > would > need to update news and VERSION etc. in staging and master. This has > to be > done because the website is built from master automatically. Great! I'm a bit puz

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "Karlin High" To: "Phil Holmes" ; "David Kastrup" Cc: "Lily devel" Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 11:05 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] On 3/22/201

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On 3/22/2019 5:43 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: the upload then went smoothly.  I'm now allowing the 2 cron jobs that create the website to run. The new build should be visible in an hour or so. The 2.19.83 binaries are already visible. I downloaded and insta

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

I created a lilypond group, added my gub user to it and the upload then went smoothly. I'm now allowing the 2 cron jobs that create the website to run. The new build should be visible in an hour or so. I used a new branch (stable/test) cloned from stable/2.20 for the build. Once all is well,

Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

On 19.03.19 00:00, David Kastrup wrote: I cherry-picked those commits now but have no idea what I am actually doing here. During the work on gub it was discoved that lilypond required etex on the build system although it never really used it. Gub pull request 59 (that worked around the probl

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Knut Petersen writes: > On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.  >> Does that seem the best way forward? > > In rsync-lily-doc.py we have: > >      system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links > --delay-updates --delete

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote: Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.  Does that seem the best way forward? In rsync-lily-doc.py we have:      system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links --delay-updates --delete --delete-after --stats --progress -pgo

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" [...] >>> I believe GUB upload uses rsync. >> >> Then it depends on the options used. Some versions Oops. Some options >> of rsync try to preserve group/owner. > > It looks like the command is this from upload.py

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:58 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:24 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM > Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 12:53 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > I understand this would be possible if someone puched a change to > release/unstable without it going through staging/master. However, > in the > life of LilyPond I don't think it has ever happened. so may not be > worth > being too concer

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:09 PM > Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:09 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] On

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > [snip previous] > > Had a successful 2.20 build today, from my newly created stable/test > branch. However, upload failed as follows: > > test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-x86.sh > test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh > test r

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

[snip previous] Had a successful 2.20 build today, from my newly created stable/test branch. However, upload failed as follows: test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-x86.sh test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh test result does not exist for lilypond-2

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > From: "John Mandereau" >> >> I'm not completely happy with the current set of instructions on page >> "Minor release checklist", even for a release from master branch: >> merging master into an existing release/unstable branch may import >> undesired changes from the latt

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 10:54 PM Subject: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 11:20 +, Phil Ho

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On 19.03.19 23:54, John Mandereau wrote: but I cannot set LILYPOND_REPO_URL with a local Git repo (i.e. with a "file:" URL) without GUB complaining about unknown VC system, so I use SSH on loopback. The most simple way to solve this problem: Create "lilypond-test" and "lilypond-doc" links  t

Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 11:20 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > John, > > Please let me/the list know if you're successful. I completed a non-clean GUB build with stable/2.20 branch, in 1h07min, done after a successful GUB build of master branch (4h05min, on a laptop with Intel Core i7-7500U and Debian t

Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

John Mandereau writes: > On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 00:00 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> The currently rather long persisting release-less state is quite a >> nuisance and I have problems understanding what stopped our releases >> from working when they did work previously and I am not aware of >> thi

Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 11:20 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > Please let me/the list know if you're successful. It would also help > me immensely if you could post a set of instructions (like the ones > for development builds in the CG at > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/minor-

Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 00:00 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > The currently rather long persisting release-less state is quite a > nuisance and I have problems understanding what stopped our releases > from working when they did work previously and I am not aware of > things particularly breaking this

Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

ot; To: "Lily devel" Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 10:30 PM Subject: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch Hi folks, I already asked almost one month ago if we could we cherry-pick the following commits from master: 88633ac Issue 5469/2: Add `TEX` environemnt variable for te

Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

John Mandereau writes: > Hi folks, > > I already asked almost one month ago if we could we cherry-pick the > following commits from master: > > 88633ac Issue 5469/2: Add `TEX` environemnt variable for texi2pdf > e757c64 Issue 5469/1: Tweak wrapped lines > 002382c Issue 5463: Fix dblatex uses xete

Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

Hi folks, I already asked almost one month ago if we could we cherry-pick the following commits from master: 88633ac Issue 5469/2: Add `TEX` environemnt variable for texi2pdf e757c64 Issue 5469/1: Tweak wrapped lines 002382c Issue 5463: Fix dblatex uses xetex backend Without them, GUB build on s