On 4/12/06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Feuer writes:
>
> > The easiest way to keep this working the same as it does now is to
> > name my new functions filled-polygon and retain the old (really
> > simple) polygon drawers in the backends.
>
> Hmm. I'd much rather just hav
David Feuer writes:
> The easiest way to keep this working the same as it does now is to
> name my new functions filled-polygon and retain the old (really
> simple) polygon drawers in the backends.
Hmm. I'd much rather just have a simple dedicated white-triangle
function, if we must.
> The poly
Hi,
maybe I should also comment on this topic, since I originally contributed
the whole polygon stuff in order to implement clusters, and thus still
feel (very) little responsible for it. ;-)
As for the triangle, yes, I also think it _is_ abuse to use the
blot-diameter in order to control th
On 4/12/06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed; no need for an assert. But in that case ... found it
>
> define-markup-command.scm:
> (define-markup-command (triangle layout props filled) (boolean?)
> "A triangle, filled or not"
>
> we use it to draw `white' triangles for chor
David Feuer writes:
> I'm not sure where you'll add it. The code in lookup.cc always calls
> the scheme function with filled?=#t
Indeed; no need for an assert. But in that case ... found it
define-markup-command.scm:
(define-markup-command (triangle layout props filled) (boolean?)
"A triangl
On 4/12/06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I'll add an assert in the c++ code and remove the parameter to match
> your next polygon scheme code.
I'm not sure where you'll add it. The code in lookup.cc always calls
the scheme function with filled?=#t
> > I would suggest that
David Feuer writes:
> I didn't even think about that. I just wrote the functions
> and gave them the interface that made the most sense to me at the
> time. I'll change it in the next version.
Ok.
>> Btw, what about the the filled? parameter, is it never used?
>
> As far as I can tell from gre
David Feuer writes:
> I would greatly appreciate some help changing the code in lookup.cc
> to match my new drawing procedures. I'm still not sure whether the
> polygon drawer should take a list of vertices or an array of
> vertices.
It seems that you changed the polygon interface from (prefixin
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> I currently have very little time to work on Lily related stuff.
That's a pity.
> I have a daytime job, two small twin girls and just bought a house :-)
Congratulations!
Ciao,
Dscho
___
lilypon
David Feuer writes:
> I've written code to do rounded polygons /properly/ in both PostScript
> and SVG. The SVG was a bit tricky because SVG doesn't have
> PostScript's arct. I would greatly appreciate some help changing the
> code in lookup.cc to match my new drawing procedures.
That's great.
I've written code to do rounded polygons /properly/ in both PostScript
and SVG. The SVG was a bit tricky because SVG doesn't have
PostScript's arct. I would greatly appreciate some help changing the
code in lookup.cc to match my new drawing procedures. I'm still not
sure whether the polygon draw
11 matches
Mail list logo
