On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:46 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
> thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between the opposing
> sides
> of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This results in Beams gettin
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:47 AM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Are you sure about this? It is incredibly hard to cut diagonal lines with
> a
> chisel. As I mentioned half an hour ago this would have hardly any effect
> in
> the common cases anyway.
>
No, I'm not sure about this. It was my understandi
On 2022-03-25 01:44, Valentin Petzel wrote:
Subject:
Slanted Beams thickness
From:
Valentin Petzel [1]
Date:
2022-03-25 01:44
To:
[2]lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hello,
Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
thickness is not measured as
Are you sure about this? It is incredibly hard to cut diagonal lines with a
chisel. As I mentioned half an hour ago this would have hardly any effect in
the common cases anyway.
And my intent is not to propose a new default, but to initiate some
discussion. This should not affect common notatio
Hi Simon,
none of these slopes are extreme enough to really make a difference.
Am Freitag, 25. März 2022, 14:21:12 CET schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On 25/03/2022 01:44, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, t
Carl,
If you look at the video I posted, could you explain how you see using that
instrument non along its tooling direction? (Like, "diagonally" wrt cutting
edge at the tip) seemd to me it would be very hard to get a straight line
doing so...
L
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, 13:52 Carl Sorensen, wrote:
Hi everyone,
On 25/03/2022 01:44, Valentin Petzel wrote:
Hello,
Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between the opposing sides
of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This results in Beams getting
optica
... which is what Valentin also just said. Sorry Valentin for the double up!
L
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, 13:43 Luca Fascione, wrote:
> Yes but look at the took and how it's held in the hand: you won't ever get
> a clean line from it holding is slanted to the direction of motion, that
> thing is mean
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:46 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
> thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between the opposing
> sides
> of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This results in Beams gettin
Yes but look at the took and how it's held in the hand: you won't ever get
a clean line from it holding is slanted to the direction of motion, that
thing is meant to be pushed straight ahead...
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, 13:19 Dan Eble, wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2022, at 04:35, Luca Fascione wrote:
> >
>
Hello all,
@Abraham: In fact this is not done at scheme level here, but at C++ level.
There reason is that we do not want to change the value of the thickness, but
for Lilypond to think about this thickness in a more natural way. Also this
example already handles the beam distance. For some rea
On Mar 25, 2022, at 04:35, Luca Fascione wrote:
>
> This video shows Hans Kuehner at work
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvyoKdW-Big
>
> at 4m36 shows beams being engraved, he appears to keep the instrument
> orthogonal to the line direction,
It's fascinating, but those beams are nearly h
Sorry, forgot to say: instead of correcting with 1/cos(\theta) I wonder if
correcting with 1/cos(\theta/2) would be an idea?
sl2 = sl / (1+sqrt(1+sl*sl)) // tan(\theta/2)
th *= sqrt(1+sl2*sl2)
HTH
L
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:35 AM Luca Fascione wrote:
> This video shows Hans Kuehner at work
>
This video shows Hans Kuehner at work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvyoKdW-Big
at 4m36 shows beams being engraved, he appears to keep the instrument
orthogonal to the line direction,
which makes Valentin's formula appropriate to capture this process.
(I love it when it goes "What happens when
Le 25/03/2022 à 01:44, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
Hello,
Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between the opposing sides
of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This results in Beams getting
optically thinn
> Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that
> is, the thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between
> the opposing sides of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This
> results in Beams getting optically thinner and closer the higher the
> slope is. But we
Hey, Valentin!
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:46 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
> thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between the opposing
> sides
> of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This results
Hello,
Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that is, the
thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between the opposing sides
of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This results in Beams getting
optically thinner and closer the higher the slope is. But we ca
18 matches
Mail list logo
