On 20-May-06, at 4:42 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
\applyMusic was the music function ancestor: you could apply a unary
function to a single music expression. So it is sort of useless now,
unless I'm missing something.
As long as all old useful examples that use the \applyMusic
feature are not
\applyMusic was the music function ancestor: you could apply a unary
function to a single music expression. So it is sort of useless now,
unless I'm missing something.
As long as all old useful examples that use the \applyMusic
feature are not rewritten into music functions, it may
certainly
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 19-May-06, at 1:31 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>> In that case, make sure to also delete the examples in input/*/
>> that use \applyMusic, otherwise you will cause some confusion
>> (of course, some of these examples may be useful and should
>> pref
On 19-May-06, at 1:31 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
In that case, make sure to also delete the examples in input/*/
that use \applyMusic, otherwise you will cause some confusion
(of course, some of these examples may be useful and should
preferably be rewritten as music functions instead).
\apply
In that case, make sure to also delete the examples in input/*/
that use \applyMusic, otherwise you will cause some confusion
(of course, some of these examples may be useful and should
preferably be rewritten as music functions instead).
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
I believe that the mater
I believe that the material in section 11.6
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/Documentation/user/lilypond/OLD-
STUFF.html#OLD-STUFF
is either hopelessly out of date or irrelevant (due to
#(define-music-function)). If nobody speaks up support of this
material, I will delete it in a week or so.
