On Thursday, January 28, 2010, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> Two points.
>
> First, policy is that we don't top post on this list. You'll be received
> better if you avoid top posting. I hope you view this as a gentle reminder;
> it's intended to be that. Thanks for understanding.
Thanks for lett
On 1/28/10 11:46 AM, "Eric Knapp" wrote:
> Thanks, I guess the answer is that I should also write a context that
> removes the engravers I want removed and then uses my new custom
> engraver. I'll look into that, too.
>
Two points.
First, policy is that we don't top post on this list. You'
On 1/28/10 9:53 AM, "Eric Knapp" wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I'm learning Scheme and how to write scheme engravers. Is it possible
> to remove other engravers within a scheme engraver? Here's a snippet
> from the Notation manual:
>
> \new Staff { \new Voice \with {
> \remove "New_fingerin
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Eric Knapp wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I'm learning Scheme and how to write scheme engravers. Is it possible
> to remove other engravers within a scheme engraver? Here's a snippet
> from the Notation manual:
>
> \new Staff { \new Voice \with {
> \remove "New_fing
Hi, everyone.
I'm learning Scheme and how to write scheme engravers. Is it possible
to remove other engravers within a scheme engraver? Here's a snippet
from the Notation manual:
\new Staff { \new Voice \with {
\remove "New_fingering_engraver"
}
\relative c'' {
% notation ref
}
I would l