Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op zaterdag 03-01-2009 om 11:58 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham > Percival: > > > I had great success converting another project to cmake last Aug, > > but this isn't anything I'd attempt with my current situation. I > > mi

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-05 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 00:39 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit : > I will include this removal in the patch that splits stuff in > buildscripts. I actually made two commits, because these two issues only intersect at builder.py and these commits are large enough. Cheers, John __

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op zaterdag 03-01-2009 om 11:58 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham Percival: > I had great success converting another project to cmake last Aug, > but this isn't anything I'd attempt with my current situation. I > might propose it for 2.15 or 2.17 (next fall or sometime next > year), though. H

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op zondag 04-01-2009 om 00:39 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John Mandereau: > I'm afraid it is too late to resurrect SCons, or too early if you > prefer. Yes, quite possibly. SCons has been the new great promising end all solution for Make for a few years too many, maybe. Having said that, past

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-03 Thread John Mandereau
Le samedi 03 janvier 2009 à 20:54 +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit : > I was hoping someone would see the beauty of scons and > junk our stepmake cruft ;-) I'm afraid it is too late to resurrect SCons, or too early if you prefer. I remember a number of packages used a so-called revolutionary prog

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:54:12PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op vrijdag 02-01-2009 om 22:53 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John > Mandereau: > > Hi John, > > > and it > > calls scripts in stepmake/bin or buildscripts that have been removed > > several years ago. > > Ouch. And here I was

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op vrijdag 02-01-2009 om 22:53 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John Mandereau: Hi John, > Have you any plan for maintaining Scons support in LilyPond? > The Python > code hasn't been updated to be compatible with Python 2.6/3.0, No. > and it > calls scripts in stepmake/bin

SCons support in LilyPond

2009-01-02 Thread John Mandereau
Hi Jan, Have you any plan for maintaining Scons support in LilyPond? The Python code hasn't been updated to be compatible with Python 2.6/3.0, and it calls scripts in stepmake/bin or buildscripts that have been removed several years ago. If we have no interest in maintaining this, I propo