Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
Hi,
I have made an extension for the reverse function in std_vector.hh.
The code suggests to implement template specialisation for reverse
vector.
On second thought, I have reservations whether this is a useful idea,
it adds quite a lot of c
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
Hi,
I have made an extension for the reverse function in std_vector.hh. The
code suggests to implement template specialisation for reverse vector.
On second thought, I have reservations whether this is a useful idea, it
adds quite a lot of code, and your memrev funct
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:58 +0200, Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
> it uses malloc to allocate memory for each item. This can also be done
> using alloca, which allocates memory on the stack and, as a consequence,
> does not have to be freed. but for alloca the same holds as for memrev,
> it is not su
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
Hi,
I have made an extension for the reverse function in std_vector.hh. The
code suggests to implement template specialisation for reverse vector.
This is what I have done, plus specialisation for float and double vectors.
The code depends on the availability of memrev
Hi,
I have made an extension for the reverse function in std_vector.hh. The
code suggests to implement template specialisation for reverse vector.
This is what I have done, plus specialisation for float and double vectors.
The code depends on the availability of memrev, which is not available
