On 06/08/2017 03:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Sounds good to me. I have a few things I'd like to get into the
stable release, one way or another, if possible.
- Some CSS edits for the docs that I started but havent
finished/submitted for review yet. I'll try to get that done in the
next few da
tes GUB's Ghostscript to 9.21.
> https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/39
>
> However, on FreeBSD 32 bit, both Ghostscript 9.20 and 9.21 crash.
> So only for FreeBSD 32 bit, Ghostscript 9.15 is used.
>
> Linux 64 bit, Linux 32 bit, Linux PPC, FreeBSD 64 bit,
> and Windows
32 bit, both Ghostscript 9.20 and 9.21 crash.
So only for FreeBSD 32 bit, Ghostscript 9.15 is used.
Linux 64 bit, Linux 32 bit, Linux PPC, FreeBSD 64 bit,
and Windows are no problem.
In my humble opinion, after or before releasing 2.20,
it is better to discontinue some platforms' binary relea
Paul writes:
> On 06/07/2017 04:34 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> tomorrow I am leaving for physical therapy.
>
> Hope it goes well David!
>
>> So how is it going to end up? Barring objections, I'll probably branch
>> off a stable release branch early next week. I'll have to see what to
>> cherr
On 06/07/2017 04:34 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
tomorrow I am leaving for physical therapy.
Hope it goes well David!
So how is it going to end up? Barring objections, I'll probably branch
off a stable release branch early next week. I'll have to see what to
cherry-pick into this branch as fix
David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, June 07, 2017 9:34 PM
> tomorrow I am leaving for physical therapy.
Hope it all goes well for you.
> So I should be able to do some reasonably straightforward work.
Good, but that should not be your priority ATM.
> So how is it going to end up? Barring objecti
Hans Aikema writes:
> David,
>
> Make sure that your main focus will be getting back into good shape.
>
> If schedule and energy levels allow for starting of a 2.20 branch I
> think it would be good to update ghostscript to a version that has the
> PNG-transparency glitches fixed that surfaced in
On 07/06/2017 22:34, David Kastrup wrote:
The alternative of releasing 2.18.3 since 2.18.2 does not even compile
using gcc-7 anymore is something I want to avoid.
2.18.2 compiled with gcc7 but the doc build failed. The patch from
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4814
fixed that
David,
Make sure that your main focus will be getting back into good shape.
If schedule and energy levels allow for starting of a 2.20 branch I think it
would be good to update ghostscript to a version that has the PNG-transparency
glitches fixed that surfaced in 2.19.51.
Ghostscript has made a
Ok folks,
tomorrow I am leaving for physical therapy. I expect 3 weeks without
extension since the problematic areas have boiled down considerably in
the last two weeks already: swallowing is an ongoing nuisance, balance
is pretty well but looking back when bicycling still is precarious in
parti
10 matches
Mail list logo
