Re: [frogs] Regression in docs: Output-suffix does not work as documented in AU 3.2.1

2009-08-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Graham Percival wrote: Good catch! Personally, I'm ok with the current program behavior. I'd be happy to adjust the docs to reflect the "1 pdf per \book" behavior. ??? We've had one PDF output per \book block as long as there have been \book blocks, as far as I can recall. This has also b

Re: [frogs] Regression in docs: Output-suffix does not work as documented in AU 3.2.1

2009-08-06 Thread Ian Hulin
Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:12:59AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote: This is AU section 3.2.1 -- If ‘filename.ly’ contains more than one \score block, then the rest of the scores will be output in numbered files, starting with ‘filename-1.pdf’. -- This is a regression:

Re: [frogs] Regression in docs: Output-suffix does not work as documented in AU 3.2.1

2009-08-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:51 AM On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:12:59AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote: This is AU section 3.2.1 -- If ‘filename.ly’ contains more than one \score block, then the rest of the scores will be output in numbered files, starting with ‘filename-1.p

Re: [frogs] Regression in docs: Output-suffix does not work as documented in AU 3.2.1

2009-08-05 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:12:59AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote: > This is AU section 3.2.1 -- > If ‘filename.ly’ contains more than one \score block, then the rest of the > scores will be output in numbered files, starting with ‘filename-1.pdf’. -- > This is a regression:  you need to use \book

Regression in docs: Output-suffix does not work as documented in AU 3.2.1

2009-08-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
> I am top posting. This is an example of something that should be sent to lilypond-devel, rather than to the frogs list. There are many developers who are not on the frogs list. Therefore, I've forwarded this to the -devel list. Thanks, Carl Sorensen On 8/5/09 5:12 PM, "Ian Hulin" wrote: