Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:01 AM
On 6/14/10 4:00 PM, "Trevor Daniels"
wrote:
Neil Puttock wrote 14 June 2010
On 14 June 2010 20:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
bin-clean should just clean up the binaries.
Yup, it saves having to rebuild fonts, so in this case shaves
off
On 6/14/10 4:00 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>
> Neil Puttock wrote 14 June 2010
>> On 14 June 2010 20:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> bin-clean should just clean up the binaries.
>>
>> Yup, it saves having to rebuild fonts, so in this case shaves off
>> a
>> significant proportion of th
Neil Puttock wrote 14 June 2010
On 14 June 2010 20:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
bin-clean should just clean up the binaries.
Yup, it saves having to rebuild fonts, so in this case shaves off
a
significant proportion of the total build time.
I saw this just after doing make clean, make.
Sure
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:04:46PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> make distclean is everything, as I understand it.
Doesn't do doc stuff. Might not do other stuff, as well.
> > (ok, time to edit the CG again...)
>
> Hence the chapter on the build system that I proposed...
If anything needs to b
On 14 June 2010 20:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> bin-clean should just clean up the binaries.
Yup, it saves having to rebuild fonts, so in this case shaves off a
significant proportion of the total build time.
> make doc-clean is documentation + fonts, I think.
Docs only.
Cheers,
Neil
_
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:28:15PM +, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
> I had to run `make bin-clean' and recompile to get round this.
Please tell me that "bin-clean" doesn't do anything that:
make doc-clean
make clean
make distclean
doesn't do.
(ok, time to edit the CG aga
On 6/14/10 1:00 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:28:15PM +, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I had to run `make bin-clean' and recompile to get round this.
>
> Please tell me that "bin-clean" doesn't do anything that:
> make doc-clean
> make clean
>
Hi Trevor,
On 2010/06/14 18:18:21, t.daniels_treda.co.uk wrote:
I downloaded and applied Patch set 1, but make failed with
make[2]: Leaving directory `/media/Data/flower/include'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/media/Data/flower'
make[1]: Entering directory `/media/Data/lily'
rm -f ./out/auto-b
ngs.hh',
> needed by `out/beaming-pattern.o'. Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/media/Data/lily'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> Trevor
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 2:47 AM
> Subject: Redo a
`include/beam-settings.hh',
needed by `out/beaming-pattern.o'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/media/Data/lily'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Trevor
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 2:47 AM
Subject: Redo autobeam settings to make resett
On 6/13/10 1:01 PM, "n.putt...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> Are you sure this is ready for review?
>
> I see comments like this,
>
> // I removed this to solve a bug; need to make sure it's right -- cds
Oh, yeah. I forgot that I had done that. I didn't put it in my notes when
I was work
Hi Carl,
Are you sure this is ready for review?
I see comments like this,
// I removed this to solve a bug; need to make sure it's right -- cds
and commented debug code,
+;(display "\nIn auto-beam.scm\n")
and alarm bells start to ring. :)
Also, there are several places where beamSettings is
Carl
At first glance this looks like a major improvement!
I'm tied up today, but I'll give it a whirl within a
day or two.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 2:47 AM
Subject: Redo autobeam settings to make resetting easier
(is
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I have *finally* completed the autobeaming patch.
The patch eliminates beamSettings as a major alist containing settings
for various time signatures.
Instead, autobeaming is controlled by some simple context properties:
beamSettings, beatLength, and measureGrouping.
In o
14 matches
Mail list logo
