Re: proposal for user view of docs

2009-07-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 01:42:33PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le samedi 11 juillet 2009 à 03:13 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > > There are a few modifications: > > - the top menu from the website might still present (I'm not > > certain if this would be a good idea or not) > >

Re: proposal for user view of docs

2009-07-15 Thread John Mandereau
Le samedi 11 juillet 2009 à 03:13 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > - the "website" is available in HTML, info, and pdf. If you type > "info lilypond", you get the website. Package managers might > create a lilypond-doc package consisting of the pdfs, or a local > copy of the HTML, or what

Re: proposal for user view of docs

2009-07-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:29:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 03:13:53AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > There are a few modifications: > > - the top menu from the website might still present (I'm not > > certain if this would be a good idea or not) > >

Re: proposal for user view of docs

2009-07-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 03:13:53AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > Here's my proposal for the user's view of the documentation. > > - the "website" is available in HTML, info, and pdf. If you type > "info lilypond", you get the website. Package managers might > create a lilypond-doc package