On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, wrote:
> In short, instead of a cryptic error message and dubious error recovery,
> the user gets a human-understandable error message and a recovery more
> likely not to cause follow-up errors.
Ok. I supposed this was the case, but wanted to be sure. I don't
t
Reviewers: lemzwerg, joeneeman, janek,
Message:
On 2012/09/26 05:35:16, janek wrote:
David wrote:
> ...and where the semantics indeed require a plain string,
> an error is generated explicitly in the action instead
> of leaving it to the parser to complain about bad grammar.
I'm not sure i un
David wrote:
...and where the semantics indeed require a plain string,
an error is generated explicitly in the action instead
of leaving it to the parser to complain about bad grammar.
I'm not sure i understand. Does this mean that in some situations there
will be errors that were not present
lgtm
http://codereview.appspot.com/6542057/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
