> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:30:32AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > please would you consider to accept the patch attached in
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1281
> > for the next release?
>
> Unfortunately our development resources are so stretched that I
> cannot make any
On 12/10/2010 11:59 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
This patch *looks* appropriate to me, but I haven't tested it, and I'm not
sure exactly how I would test it.
Pavel, do you have a test file that can work with the patch so we can
demonstrate it works properly?
Here's one, try running it through lily
On 10/12/10 9:30 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:30:32AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> please would you consider to accept the patch attached in
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1281
>> for the next release?
>
> Unfortunately our development resou
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:30:32AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> please would you consider to accept the patch attached in
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1281
> for the next release?
Unfortunately our development resources are so stretched that I
cannot make any guarantees. H
