On 28/12/09 20:09, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 01:03:19PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/28/09 12:54 PM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
Why discuss git gui at all? Just give the command-line options.
If somebody just wants to get work done, they use lily-git.tcl.
If they
Le lundi 28 décembre 2009 à 21:10 +, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> No. Git GUI and gitk provide a far easier way to work with
> branches than the command line. If the intention is to help
> people move up to developing why deliberately make it harder?
Sure. FWIW I use gitk as much as command
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, December 28, 2009 8:03 PM
Actually, I think it's a three-way split:
* those using lily-git (not lilypond-git, that's the name of the
directory)
This option requires no knowledge of git at all -- just use
the 3
buttons
* those using git gui
* those using g
Graham Percival wrote Monday, December 28, 2009 8:09 PM
Why discuss git gui at all? Just give the command-line options.
No. Git GUI and gitk provide a far easier way to work with
branches than the command line. If the intention is to help
people move up to developing why deliberately mak
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 01:03:19PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 12/28/09 12:54 PM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
>
> > Mark, this means you've got the option in your re-design of the CG
> > chapter headings to have a split between
> > * contributors using the git GUI and lilypond-git (formerly lilyco
On 12/28/09 12:54 PM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
> On 28/12/09 17:46, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>> Graham Percival wrote:
Dscho offered to make a custom git installer for windows,
which apparently would have this built-in.
>>>
>>> I'm c
On 28/12/09 17:46, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Dscho offered to make a custom git installer for windows,
which apparently would have this built-in.
I'm currently on a Windows XP machine (just for this week);
...
and it
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> Dscho offered to make a custom git installer for windows,
>> which apparently would have this built-in.
>
> I'm currently on a Windows XP machine (just for this week);
...
> and it works fine.
ok, in that case let's
Graham Percival wrote:
>> A related question, Does wish (and therefore
>> lilypond-git) run in the bash shell provided by git on
>> Windows, if not, in the words of NASA: "Houston, we have
>> a problem. . ."
>
> Dscho offered to make a custom git installer for windows,
> which apparently would h
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:59:19AM +, Ian Hulin wrote:
> A related question, Does wish (and therefore lilypond-git) run in the
> bash shell provided by git on Windows, if not, in the words of NASA:
> "Houston, we have a problem. . ."
Dscho offered to make a custom git installer for window
On 12/28/09 4:59 AM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
> A related question, Does wish (and therefore lilypond-git) run in the
> bash shell provided by git on Windows, if not, in the words of NASA:
> "Houston, we have a problem. . ."
>
On my Parallels version of XP, when I downloaded and installed MsysGi
A related question, Does wish (and therefore lilypond-git) run in the
bash shell provided by git on Windows, if not, in the words of NASA:
"Houston, we have a problem. . ."
Cheers,
Ian
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://l
On 12/27/09 11:01 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:30:11PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> Currently, lilycontrib uses ~/lilypond/, which may conflict with an
>> installed LilyPond directory.
>>
>> Should we change the directory to ~/lilypond-git, or ~/lilypond-src?
>
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:30:11PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Currently, lilycontrib uses ~/lilypond/, which may conflict with an
> installed LilyPond directory.
>
> Should we change the directory to ~/lilypond-git, or ~/lilypond-src?
Let's do ~/lilypond-git, since that reinforces the notion t
14 matches
Mail list logo
