On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 23:29 -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> In particular, I had an OSC server that translated OSC
> messages into lilypond code, compiled it into pngs, then displayed the
> results as HTML pages. The idea is that I'd have one central computer
> that would generate music (with
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
The best way to do this, is to write a scheme extension that reads file
names from a socket or a pipe, processes those. Then you can save on the
startup time of LilyPond.
Didn't Graham do something like this, calling it
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The best way to do this, is to write a scheme extension that reads file
> names from a socket or a pipe, processes those. Then you can save on the
> startup time of LilyPond.
Didn't Graham do something like this, calling it LilyPond server?
C
Well, in the case of LilyPond it is sure, that we can achieve better
performance if all the declaration, font and everything stuff is not
loaded each time.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 12:07:34 +0100, Bertalan Fodor dijo:
>
> >I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program
> >resident so that invocation are less painful.
> Unless it is being swapped out to the virtual memory.
>
> >Office and OpenOffice do
> >
> They are swappe
Francisco Vila escreveu:
> El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 10:27:51 +0100, laurent-ducos dijo:
>> We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so
>> greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of
>> lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does
I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program
resident so that invocation are less painful.
Unless it is being swapped out to the virtual memory.
Office and OpenOffice do
They are swapped out as well. And you gain nothing.
Bert
El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 10:27:51 +0100, laurent-ducos dijo:
> We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so
> greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of
> lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does Y have to you
> it a means of
