Re: Partial compilation (again)

Am 21.11.2014 13:33, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Am 21. November 2014 12:36:59 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : So I don't see this going anywhere fast. To get a hook into cloning internal engraver states, you'd probably want to create a more object-oriented frame work for them.

Re: Partial compilation (again)

Urs Liska writes: > Am 21. November 2014 12:36:59 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : > >>So I don't see this going anywhere fast. To get a hook into cloning >>internal engraver states, you'd probably want to create a more >>object-oriented frame work for them. > > Ok, I see. Thank you for the explanat

Re: Partial compilation (again)

Am 21. November 2014 12:36:59 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : >Urs Liska writes: > >> I have another suggestion, somewhat related to >> >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-11/msg00139.html >> >> I would still like to see the possibility to re-compile individual >> staves only. >>

Re: Partial compilation (again)

Urs Liska writes: > I have another suggestion, somewhat related to > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-11/msg00139.html > > I would still like to see the possibility to re-compile individual > staves only. > And with a sloppy-line-breaking option (maybe in combination with > s